Answer:
“He is a genius and an athlete, is under-handicapped, and should be regarded as extremely dangerous.”
Explanation:
The options to the question are:
“If you see this boy,” said the ballerina, “do not—I repeat, do not—try to reason with him.”
“He is a genius and an athlete, is under-handicapped, and should be regarded as extremely dangerous.”
“My God—” said George, “that must be Harrison!”
“Gee—I could tell that one was a doozy,” said Hazel.
Irony can be defined as the state of affairs that is contradictory opposite to what one would normally expect.
The ironic thing about the excerpt from <em>Harrison Bergeron </em>by Kurt Vonnegut is option B because it is contradictory for someone that is considered a genius and an athlete to be looked upon as "under-handicapped" and "regarded as extremely dangerous".
Answer:Dickinson most often punctuated her poems with dashes, rather than the more expected array of periods, commas, and other punctuation marks. She also capitalized interior words, not just words at the beginning of a line.
Explanation:
Answer:
I cant help you if there is no story or question.
The answer is B. Finn and D. Carl since those are names, or proper nouns. The words friend and fish are regular nouns, so they don't need capitalization.
Answer: HOPE THIS HELPS!!
Once a decade, every state redraws its electoral districts, determining which people will be represented by each politician. In many states, this means that politicians gather behind computer screens to figure out how they can manipulate the lines to box out their competition and maximize the power of their political party. While an increasing number of states employ independent commissions to draw district lines, the large majority still lack safeguards to prevent partisan favoritism in the redistricting process—also known as partisan gerrymandering.
It has been almost a decade since the 2010 cycle of redistricting, and the country is still reckoning with the impact. Last May, the Center for American Progress published a report that found that unfairly drawn congressional districts shifted, on average, a whopping 59 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives during the 2012, 2014, and 2016 elections. That means that every other November, 59 politicians that would not have been elected based on statewide voter support for their party won anyway because the lines were drawn in their favor—often by their allies in the Republican or Democratic Party.
To help put this number in perspective, a shift of 59 seats is slightly more than the total number of seats apportioned to the 22 smallest states by population. It is also more than the number of representatives for America’s largest state, California, which has 53 House members representing a population of nearly 40 million people.
Explanation:
