The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The question does not provide options, but we can say the following.
The federal regulations state that the IRB must conduct continuing review of research approved by a convened IRB (more than minimal risk research) at intervals appropriate to the degree of risk, but not less than once per year. The continuing review must be periodical.
IRB stands for Institutional Review Board. This office was created to protect the rights research about human issues. To do this, IRB has to examine the questions that are to be asked to humans in a survey because it needs to guard people's privacy. That is why IRB can approve or not research on humans, and in any case, can order modifications to the surveys.
Answer:
- Explanatory
Explanation:
<u>Explanatory variable</u> is elucidated as the variable that could affect the response variable. This variable is quite identical with the independent variable as it can be controlled or changed that may affect the response variable(which is similar to dependent variable). However, the observational studies observe the natural responses without any manipulation and therefore, these variables cannot be changed always. In the given example, the 'number of hours spent on studying for the test' would be the explanatory variable as it directly influences the response variable i.e. 'grades.'
Answer: you would be likely to make her think more about the factors that influence her memory.
Explanation: Metamomery also known as Socratic awareness is a subdiscipline of the study of metacognition.
Metamemory is the knowledge perceptions about one's memory capabilities and the steps involved in memory self-monitoring.
Metamemory basically evaluates the factors that influence memory and how they can be ameliorated.
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Twelve-year-old Nathaniel was having trouble solving the word problems in his math homework. His dad began reading the problems aloud and emphasizing the important information. As Nathaniel started catching on, his dad gradually provided less help for each new problem. This interaction illustrates:
A) Piaget's concept of concrete operational thought.
B) Erikson's concept of industry versus inferiority.
C) Vygotsky's concept of scaffolding.
D) Piaget's concept of conservation.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter C) Vygotsky's concept of scaffolding.
Explanation:
According to Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development, scaffolding is the process in which a supporter helps a learner, but only to a certain extent. As the learner grows more knowledgeable, the supporter gradually withdraws his help, allowing the learner to do things on his own. Eventually, the learner becomes responsible for the outcome of his tasks. That is what Nathaniel's father is doing while helping him with his math homework. He assists Nathaniel, but slowly steps away allowing his son to solve problems on his own as he gains more knowledge.
Answer:
Donate money to a school.
Explanation:
