1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
slava [35]
3 years ago
9

Location is a matter of __. Place is a matter of

History
1 answer:
4vir4ik [10]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:Location is a matter of where a particular featured is actually positioned. It refers to the absolute position of a feature. A place describes the relative position of features.

Explanation: NOW MARK ME AS BRAINLIST

You might be interested in
Which statement BEST describes how the government of ancient Rome influenced the United States?
katovenus [111]

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

Many of the principles of the Roman Republic are similar to the American system of Government.Their leader were elected to positions by citizens and were accountable to those citizens because of this more power.

6 0
3 years ago
In the summer of 1863, Lee launched his last assault into the North and was defeated at the Battle of __________________, which
Ludmilka [50]
It was the battle of gettysburg
8 0
3 years ago
What is the meaning of the term "arms race"?
kicyunya [14]

Answer:

a competition between nations for superiority in the development and accumulation of weapons, especially between the US and the former Soviet Union during the Cold War.

3 0
4 years ago
Justin graduates from high school in one month. He already has an offer for a full-time job that would pay $25,000 a year. He is
Serga [27]

Answer:

$25,000

Explanation:

Opportunity cost is the value of an alternative forgone. If he attends college, he will forgo $25,000 which he would have made if he did not go to college. Hence, the opportunity cost of Justin going to college is $25,000.

3 0
3 years ago
Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse were two Native American Chiefs who willing signed treaties with the U.S., agreeing to give their l
Evgesh-ka [11]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse were two Native American Chiefs who fought against the American settlers encroaching their land.

Both were famous for leading their people to victory against the United States army during the 1876 Battle of Little Bighorn, where they won against the United States, General George Armstrong Custer.

Hence, in this case, the correct answer is FALSE. Both Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse were two Native American Chiefs who were NOT willing to sign treaties with the U.S., agreeing to give their land away. But instead fought against them.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What do critics say will be an effect of globalization?
    11·2 answers
  • After wwi most americans wanted to avoid future wars by
    7·1 answer
  • Who provoked the Franco Prussian war
    13·1 answer
  • A massive drought and heat wave caused the dust bowl in texas, however, the damage was compounded by the lack of prairie grass.
    8·1 answer
  • Approximately how much of Nixon's term remained after he resigned?
    11·1 answer
  • Where does sea-floor spreading occur??
    5·2 answers
  • Summary of the event of treaty of paris?
    10·1 answer
  • Multiple Choice
    9·2 answers
  • The Roaring 20's was an exciting time in American history that brought about significant changes to
    10·1 answer
  • Use your historical sequencing skills. Based on the timeline,What is the purpose of the symbol that is encircled on this timelin
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!