The strange claim that Brutus and Cassius made about Friendship is where they said that they had acted as Julius Caesars' friends by reducing the time it took to be afraid of death.
<h3>Why is the above claim strange?</h3>
Brutus' claim is strange because friends do not kill one another.
Recall that Brutus was not even Cassius' real friend as he had deceived him into the act. True friendship is not based on deception either.
See the link below for more about Julius Caesar:
brainly.com/question/1324420
The person above me is correct - the word hazardous is indeed an objective complement, because it follows the direct object <em>snakes. </em>Therefore, it completes it. <em />
Answer:It is the participial phrase – brimming with water. Here, the sentence is formed with the help of a modifier such as a noun phrase, pronoun, or even a noun. For instance, brimming is using the rainwater as the modifier to explain the action that is done. Here open barrel will be the noun.
Explanation:
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Unlike the other options, it addresses hearing loss due to ear buds, plus it involves research done by a professional
Answer:
many Americans opposed the war on moral grounds
