1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olga_2 [115]
3 years ago
15

What did Europeans in the fourteenth century do during times of famine to survive?

History
2 answers:
IRINA_888 [86]3 years ago
5 0
One thing that Europeans in the fourteenth century did during times of famine to survive was that they "<span>killed and ate their draft animals," since this was a last resort and did not bring them a long-term advantage. </span>
Fiesta28 [93]3 years ago
3 0

In the fourteenth century, Europeans killed and ate their draft animals to survive. During the <em>Great Famine</em>, as it was known, the vast majority of population in Europe were peasants who, unlike the nobles, did not possess reserves of food supply. The unfavorable weather conditions make it impossible for them to grow any kind of crop. As a consequence, they had to resort to <em>slaughter their draft animals </em>as the only hope of surviving.

You might be interested in
How would practicing Buddhism affect people's daily lives?
antoniya [11.8K]
Make them more religious and would relate to their family
7 0
3 years ago
This side only had to fight a defensive war? North or south
Andreyy89

Answer:

The North was fighting for reunification, and the South for independence. But as the war progressed, the Civil War gradually turned into a social, economic and political revolution with unforeseen consequences. The Union war effort expanded to include not only reunification, but also the abolition of slavery

Explanation:

hope it will help you

4 0
2 years ago
The Supreme Court justices are more willing to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional than to strike down presidential action
stealth61 [152]
Laws passed through congress have a direct impact on the court system, since it changes the way courts have to rule on the law. The Supreme court allows the court system to have some say in what laws are just by appealing their agreement with the constitution. The President doesn't directly pass laws, he has the power to veto congressional laws and through his endorsement behind them, but doesn't actually have the power to write, create or pass new laws himself, even if he's the one who technically signs them into law. As such, the supreme court checks the president less often than congress, because the president's actions affect the court's sphere of interest less often. Most interaction between the president and the court happen when the President heavily endorses a bill, gets it passed through congress, and then the court checks it. Some great examples are the Agricultural Adjustment Administration and the National Recovery Administration, which were created through bills sponsored by Franklin Roosevelt as part of his New Deal reforms. The court struck them down as unconstitutional for various reasons, much to the dismay of FDR. In modern times, Obamacare almost had it's individual mandate requirement stuck down by the court a few years ago and elements of President Trump's muslim travel ban were struck down by the supreme court just in the last month.
8 0
4 years ago
What were the major failings of the Dawes Act? (Site 1)
satela [25.4K]

Answer:

Historian Eric Foner believed "the policy proved to be a disaster, leading to the loss of much tribal land and the erosion of Indian cultural traditions." The law often placed Indians on desert land unsuitable for agriculture, and it also failed to account for Indians who could not afford the cost of farming. In addition to scant payment, Native Americans were not used to spending money and quickly spent most of what they received. Many were left with little land and little money. Inheritance also became an issue for many Native Americans who enrolled to receive land from the Dawes Act. The assimilation policy of the Dawes Act failed because it didn't take into account the social and cultural differences between the Native Americans and the white settlers. Many others like the Kiowas didn't want to assimilate into white culture and as such resisted.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
What type of government does Burma (Myanmar) have? A. a constitutional monarchy B. a military junta C. a presidential republic D
Lera25 [3.4K]

Answer:

The government of Myanmar functions as a parliamentary republic. In this type of government, the heads of the Cabinet are responsible for carrying out the laws set by Parliament

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which country’s system of government is based on the U.S. model?
    10·1 answer
  • Someone please help ASAP I’ll give brainliest
    8·1 answer
  • An important part of president nixion domestic policy was
    8·1 answer
  • In the late 1800's, the South Carolina legislature adopted a plan in which congressional districts were redrawn so that only one
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following events led to the other three?
    5·2 answers
  • Mirabeau Lamar believed that Native Americans had no right to Texas land because they did not help fight against Mexico for inde
    5·2 answers
  • Who created the first pizza restaurant?
    14·1 answer
  • which of the following most transform the economy of the south in the early eighteen-hundreds? ​ please help me
    7·1 answer
  • Why were many Jews in Judaea awaiting a leader from god?
    10·1 answer
  • Explain how Nazis were able to provide information to the public. PLEASE HELP
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!