Answer:
Niether of the party to contract earned any gain on this investment
Explanation:
The reason is that the both companies exchanged assets whose Fair Market value was equal to the amount received. This is because the Baron Corporation would would had written down its asset at FMV which means the asset is sold at a price that actually costs the Broom Corporation if it uses the asset for its rest of the life. Furthermore, the Docker will also not recognize any gain on the stock repurchased sold because it is not permitted in the accounting standard.
Answer:
a. Selective attention/comprehension
Explanation:
Selective attention/comprehension -
It refers to some specific external factors , which alerts someone's attention , is referred to as Selective attention/comprehension .
The factors can be some external factors like some specific words , activities , situation etc.
Hence , from the given scenario of the question ,
The students gets distracted by the sound of the pencil on desk .
The correct answer is a. Selective attention/comprehension .
Answer:
1. Huprey can resonably estimate that a pending lawsuit will result in damages of $1,280,000, it is probable that Huprey will lose the case.
2. It is reasonably possible that Huprey will lose a pending lawsuit. The loss cannot be estimable.
3. Huprey is being sued for damages of $2,400,000. It is very unlikely (remote) that Huprey will lose the case.
Explanation:
Contingent liabilities must be recorded only when it is probable that the liability will happen and you can estimate the associated costs.
When contingent liabilities are only reasonably possible or you cannot estimate the amount, they must be included in the footnotes of the financial statements.
When contingent liabilities are not reasonably possible, nothing needs to be disclosed.
Answer:
D) a rise in price
Explanation:
At the equilibrium point, the quantity demanded and the quantity supplied are the same. There is no excess shortage or supply in both demand and supply.
A shortage occurs when suppliers are not able to meet the market demand. Here, demand is the quantity that buyers are willing to buys at a specific price over time. As per the law of demand, high product price causes demand to decrease while low price results in increased demand.
A shortage of a product means its demand is high. Many buyers are willing to buy the commodity at the current price. As per the law of demand, a price increase will result in reduced demand and achieve equilibrium.
Answer: d. any of the choices.
Explanation:
Chaz is not to transfer the duties to a third party if Dolly got into the agreement with Chaz for any of the following;
- If Dolly places special trust in the ability of Chaz to perform the maintenance then that trust should not be broken by transferring the duties to a third party. Dolly went into that contract because they trusted in the abilities of Chaz.
- If Dolly went into the contract due to the personal skills or talents of Chaz, the duties against would be non-transferable. Chaz's skills were the reason the contract was signed, if these skills are not to be used then the contract will be baseless.
- By signing with Chaz, Dolly expects a certain level of performance. If the performance that will be made by a third contracting party is materially different from the one that Dolly would have expected from Chez, the duties will not be transferable.
