According to a different source, this question refers to the Brown v. Board of Education decision. In this case, the court issued a unanimous decision in favor of the Brown family. This decision was written by Chief Justice Earl Warren.
I would argue that Warren's rhetoric is persuasive and authoritative. He very clearly explains the reasons why the Court reached this decision. This conveys a feeling of knowledge and clarity. The line that I find most moving is:
<em>"To separate [black children] from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely to ever be undone."</em>
I find this line to be very powerful because it gets to the source of the problem. By explaining how black children might feel, it encourages people to rethink segregation. It also supports the idea that all people are equally valuable, regardless of their color.
Answer:
adjective
Explanation:
it resembles without being identical
Hi josiah bro im need your help i don't like reading as much and all these questions are throwing me off.
Hello there. :')
<span>
Franny is writing a research paper on edgar allan poe’s poem “the raven.” she wants to include evidence for a point in her essay that she’s found in a secondary source, but she can’t decide whether to quote directly or paraphrase. which statement best describes when franny should quote a source directly?
</span>when the source information is written in a particularly brilliant or witty way
As a woman I would wish that B would be the correct answer but if we are talking about what would happen if it were historically correct then D would be the right answer because that's what women "were made to do".
