It is possible
Explanation:
If a president vetos a bill it is sent back and can be revised and sent back to the president for further review and if he accepts it then it becomes a law if not then it goes back and gets edited agian and back to the president.
I think the answer is the United States
Answer: It is the third option, the Democratic party.
Answer:
Missouri’s bid to become the first state west of the Mississippi River, and to allow slavery within its borders, set off a bitter debate in a Congress that was already divided into pro- and anti-slavery factions. During the debate, Rep. James Tallmadge of New York proposed an amendment to the statehood bill that would have eventually ended slavery in Missouri and set the existing enslaved workers there free. Southerners who opposed the Missouri Compromise did so because it set a precedent for Congress to make laws concerning slavery, while Northerners disliked the law because it meant slavery was expanded into new territory. Sorry I can't list everything this was an essay that I don't have anymore I'm just going off the top of my head.
Explanation:
Answer: redraw voting districts that are roughly equal in population
Explanation:
In Baker v. Carr (1962), held that Tennessee had infringed the constitutional right of equal protection and forced its legislature to reapportion itself based on population. Before that, rural areas had been overrepresented when compared to urban and suburban areas, especially in the South. Although this case didn´t change electoral districts immediatly, it did set a precedent about federal courts addressing redistricting, and by 1964, in Wesberry v. Sanders and Reynolds v. Sims, the United States House of Representatives and the state legislatures were required to establish electoral districts of equal population based on the idea of one man, one vote.
.
