The increase in the company's products in one unit will increase Marginal Revenue to increase by $100 and Marginal Cost to increase by $120.
<h2><u>Marginal Revenue and Marginal Cost</u></h2><h3>Marginal Revenue</h3>
It is referred to as the change in the revenue value due to the selling of an additional product. In the question given above, the revenue for producing 100 units is $10,000 ($100 x 100 units). So, when 1 additional unit is produced the extra revenue earned is $100 ($10,100 - $10,000). Therefore, the marginal revenue is $100.
<h3>Marginal Cost</h3>
It is referred to as the extra cost for producing an additional unit. In the given scenario, the cost for producing the 100 units is $8,000 (100 units x $80). When producing an additional unit the cost goes up to $8,120. Therefore, the marginal cost for producing an additional unit is $120 ($8,120 - $8,000).
<h3> The Bottom Line</h3>
Companies used the details on marginal revenue and marginal cost to:
- Determine Ideal production levels
- Calculate their profitability rate
- Prepare plans to remain competitive and profitable
Hence, the Marginal Revenue and Marginal Cost for one additional unit are $100 and $120 respectively.
Learn more on Marginal Revenue and Marginal Cost here: brainly.com/question/16615264
Self pollination happens when the pollen is deposited on the same flower or another flower on the same plant, while cross pollination is the transfer of pollen from another plant on a different flower
Answer:
It was an intentional attempt to get rid an entire race. Many Hutus and a majority of important government officials came to the conclusion that the real problem was Rwanda's Tutsi minority. They trained and organized armed paramilitary gangs to kill Tutsi civilians.
C. North America. 'the french and indian war' is however more of an american name for the war, the europeans mostly call it the 'seven years war'
Answer:
No.
Explanation:
Unless the juror could refer to evidence which proved the boy had committed the crime, then that view is invalid. Such labelling, present in the film, showed the dangers in pre-judging an individual. The film was taking a liberal view of society and justice personified by Henry Fonda against the widespread conservative prejudices of his fellow jurors.
