Answer: Because, they are different culture, and they do different things from us, American has more history than French
Explanation: that's what i'm thinking
Answer:
<em><u>C</u></em>
Explanation:
first smooth muscle, then skeletal muscle
Answer:
O The president refused to recognize the state until it gave Freedmen the right to vote.
Explanation:
The ability of the Louisiana State to be recognized and allowed to enter the Union as one of the states under the United States of America was as a result of the leaders to grant the freemen the right to vote as well as the abolishment of Slave trading.<em> Meeting this simple rights, is part of the conditions given to them which they had no other options than to do.</em>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?
No, really not.
The reason why because his account had created many controversies.
Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.
So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.
A. Urban II
These incursions prompted the emperor of Byzantium, Alexius I Comnenus to send a delegation to Piacenza, Italy, asking Pope Urban II in March 1095 for help against the Turks. On November 27, 1095, in Clermont, France, Pope Urban II called for a crusade to help the Byzantines and to free the city of Jerusalem.
