The analogy below with the same relationship as - Glove is to Hand would be "<span>b. Wall is to paint" since paint covers a wall like a glove covers the hand. </span>
The composition of the dangers of backbiting is shown below.
<h3>
What is composition?</h3>
- As it pertains to writing, the phrase composition can characterize writers' decisions about, procedures for developing, and occasionally the end outcome of, a text.
The composition of the dangers of backbiting:
- Many people do not take backbiting and gossip seriously.
- We recognize stealing, wrath, and envy as sins right away, yet we frequently dismiss gossip and backbiting as faults.
- We can backbite so easily that we can do it while thinking.
- A routine conversation becomes an opportunity to complain or condemn someone.
- Perhaps we have a bias against someone and secretly want others to share that bias, weaving comments into a conversation to encourage others to agree, "Oh, yes, he's so much like this" or "It's just terrible how she gets away with that."
- When we backbite, we encourage others to backbite as well.
- Backbiting has negative results, such as division, dissatisfaction, and suspicion.
- Backbiting has left an unpleasant aftertaste in my mouth.
- A minor disagreement might grow into a major one, causing a schism between friends.
- Where formerly there was a clean and pure source, it has become agitated to the point of becoming black and muddy.
Know more about composition here:
brainly.com/question/26373912
#SPJ4
The indefinite pronoun neither is always singular.
Neither is the negative counterpart of 'either' which is also singular. The basic principle of Subject-Verb Agreement says that the subject and verb must agree with each other, so you should use a singular verb because 'either' and 'neither' are considered singular; however, this principle is sometimes broken by a plural verb which can be used after 'either' and 'neither' informally.
Answer:
In moderation, yes.
Explanation:
President FDR was surely a great president for what he did for Americans in the 1940s. Forcing Japanese internment camps are not one of his greatest contributions in our history living modernly, but back in the 40s it was not so frowned upon. If we, in modern days, looked back on this moment, we can see FDR was not so different than Hitler for forcing Japanese Americans out their homes and into camps. However, when we look back at the actions during WWII and we understand America's relationship with Japan and the unease it caused Americans, we may be able to sympathize with FDR and understand why he made that decision. He should be criticized for his actions, but those who criticize him should also understand why he made the decision he made.
*Hopefully this is what you're looking for. Good Luck!*
Is this a true or false question? If it is I think that it is true but im not positive.
