1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
I am Lyosha [343]
3 years ago
12

Activity

History
1 answer:
PolarNik [594]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Sample 2 describes the characters visually. The writer details the character’s emotions and gestures. In Sample 1, the scene lacks a vivid visual description, which makes it difficult for the reader to understand or visualize the scene.

Sample 2 clearly mentions what the characters are wearing and how they look. Sample 1 only mentions that two men are sitting at a restaurant. There is no additional information that can help a reader visualize the characters or setting while reading the description.

Sample 1 gives a vague description of how the character gets angry and fights with the biker, but Sample 2 describes in detail how the characters first glares at the biker before hurling punches at him. Sample 2 gives many visual cues, which can help professionals such as the cameraman and costume designer.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which of the following were benefits of the Gl. Bill of Rights for veterans? Select the two correct answers
ludmilkaskok [199]

Answer:

B and C

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Chattel slavery was used:
attashe74 [19]
It will be b..............
4 0
3 years ago
Can somebody help pls!! Thank u
Anastasy [175]
The answer should be evolutionary theory, good luck!
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Was the attack of the dogs planned? From “Animal Farm”
omeli [17]
No it was not planned
6 0
4 years ago
Why was the Supreme Court’s decision on California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians significant?
PSYCHO15rus [73]

The correct answer is A

California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians was a US Supreme Court landmark decision issued in 1987. It abolished laws which restricted gaming and gambling on Indian reservations. States desired to control gaming in reservations but this decision concluded that Indian gambling could only be restricted in states where all gaming activities were deemed criminal according to state law. It was considered unconstitutional, that the states tried to limit only certain type of gambling activities and not others.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Select all the reasons why the Spanish colonists settled in America.
    12·2 answers
  • Whta was guardaship in the rome republic
    11·1 answer
  • Which best describes Calvin Coolidge’s relationship with business, industry, and the stock market?
    7·2 answers
  • What was the United States' main motivation for continued participation in the international arena after World War II?
    8·2 answers
  • Applying the law equally throughout the land is a characteristic of which of the following?
    6·1 answer
  • What countries are part of the NATO Alliance
    9·1 answer
  • What is the desert that extends 1,000 miles through southeast Mongolia<br> and north China?
    6·2 answers
  • Rationalists (like Descartes) and empiricists (like Locke and Berkeley) differ on their epistemology approach because:
    14·1 answer
  • Which phrase best summarizes the purpose behind the Bill of Rights? (2 points)
    6·2 answers
  • I THINK THE ANSWER IS D
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!