1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ksenya-84 [330]
3 years ago
10

What conclusion can you draw about the effects of civil rights legislation?

History
2 answers:
Umnica [9.8K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

yes A is correct

Explanation:

Vilka [71]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

a.Participation of African-Americans in government increased.

Explanation:

The Civil Rights Act of 1960 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, both promoted by President Lyndon B. Johnson of the Democratic Party, codified the achievements of the blacks. They ensured the end of racial segregation in public spaces, even if they were private property, and universal voting, regardless of educational level or social status. One of the results was the increased participation of African-Americans in government, which generated a representation of blacks in politics.

You might be interested in
Why did the French invade Germany in 1923?
77julia77 [94]

Answer:

The answer is 1. German failures to pay reparations

5 0
3 years ago
Political concern that have emerged since the turn of the century
Fittoniya [83]
LGBT rights is a big topic if you wanted to talk about that.
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following men took Mexico City?
Vlad [161]
<span>It was General Windfield Scott. He led the campaign to take Mexico City.  First he laid siege on Vera Cruz with the help of Commodore Mathew C. Perry and then advance to Puebla where he routed the Mexican defenders there.  On his way to Mexico, he was involved in several fights such as Churabusco, Molino Del Rey and Chapultepec.  He defeated Sta. Ana at the Battle of Huamantla which was Sta. Ana’s last battle.  He also dealt with Mexican Guerillas and eventually won the war against Mexico.</span>
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the Supreme Court case of Worcester v Georgia (1832) the supreme court ruled. . .
MrMuchimi

Answer:Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 515 (1832), was a landmark case in which the United States Supreme Court vacated the conviction of Samuel Worcester and held that the Georgia criminal statute that prohibited non-Native Americans from being present on Native American lands without a license from the state was ... The Court did not ask federal marshals to carry out the decision ...

Explanation:

4 0
4 years ago
Some of the techniques in data gathering useful for data interpretation​
miss Akunina [59]

oral

Explanation:

someone can speak and present through speach

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is NOT a true statement about the president's cabinet?
    13·2 answers
  • Describe the economic advantage of Constantinople's location.​
    9·1 answer
  • Neither congress nor the states can pass an ___ that inflicts punishment without a court trial
    5·2 answers
  • Altering photographs was part of Joseph Stalin’s effort to
    7·2 answers
  • __________ ran in the 1968 presidential election as a third party candidate on a platform supporting states' rights and segregat
    6·1 answer
  • Guys I need the right answer ASAP! Is the answer
    9·1 answer
  • In which aconomic system does the government have complete control over manufacturing and production
    15·1 answer
  • Explain the impact of the Battle of Vienna 1683.
    14·1 answer
  • Explain one example of a connection between mongolian and chinese political structures in the period
    10·1 answer
  • Where were newcomers to texas able to preserve their cultural heritage as a community?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!