Answer:
The value of the merged firm if the synergy created by the merger is $3,200 is $213,600
Explanation:
In order to calculate the value of the merged firm if the synergy created by the merger is $3,200 we would have to calculate the following formula:
value of the merged firm=(shares of stock outstanding*market price) + (teds shares*price) + $3,200
value of the merged firm=(6,500*$26) + (2,300*$18) + $3,200
value of the merged firm=$213,600
The value of the merged firm if the synergy created by the merger is $3,200 is $213,600
Answer:
Weak-tie
Explanation:
According to research in the area of entrepreneurship, it is more likely that an entrepreneur will get a new business idea through a Weak-tie relationship.
Weak-tie relationship are the relationship with acquantiance that it give more favor than from someone, whom we know already. Social networking is the perfect examples in these days to build those relationship and it bridges that gap. These weak-tie help in getting new business and explore new area, which help to grow. It also add sense of belongingness to the community, when we have more weak-ties.
Answer:
a. 1.8716%
b. $13,937.9955
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
a. For accrued interest
= (Coupon rate ÷ 2) × (Before settlement days ÷ Total settlement days)
= (4.750% ÷ 2) × (145 days ÷ 145 days + 39 days)
= 2.3750% × 0.7880
= 1.8716%
b. Now the dirty price is
= Face value × (accrued interest percentage + current price quoted on the bond)
= $13,000 × (1.8716% + 105.34375%)
= $13,000 × 107.21535%
= $13,937.9955
By applying the above formulas we can get the accrued interest and the dirty price
Answer:
I notice two possible issues here:
First, focusing on selling only the base model might increase total sales volume but might not increase profits. Generally, premium models are more expensive and yield a higher contribution margin. I might be wrong here because there is no mention to contribution margins, but generally things work differently. E.g. car salespeople do not usually offer the base model first, they generally show the highest trims.
Second, in countries like Japan, common goals for groups might work since the culture is much more collaborative between group members. But in the US, where performance and success is measured on a much more personal way, it might not work very well. It doesn't mean that team work is no good, but making the whole group responsible for reaching a certain sales goal is not adequate. Imagine that you manage to increase your sales by 15%, but since the total sales of the entire group didn't increase as much and didn't meet the stated goals. What will happen to you? Under normal conditions, increasing sales in such a way would probably result in a bonus besides higher sales commissions.