1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pochemuha
3 years ago
11

List one negative impact of the Panama Canal to Indigenous peoples of Panama.

History
1 answer:
pogonyaev3 years ago
7 0
One negative impact would be people or citizens of the Panama would dislike that Indigenous people can come over into the Panama and the trading would extend until free trade without quotas or tariffs.
You might be interested in
When is the only time a new justice may be appointed?
Usimov [2.4K]

The appointment and confirmation of Justices to the Supreme Court of the United States involves several steps set forth by the United States Constitution, which have been further refined and developed by decades of tradition. Candidates are nominated by the President of the United States and must face a series of hearings in which both the nominee and other witnesses make statements and answer questions before the Senate Judiciary Committee, which can vote to send the nomination to the full United States Senate.[1] Confirmation by the Senate allows the President to formally appoint the candidate to the court.[1] The Constitution does not set any qualifications for service as a Justice, thus the President may nominate any individual to serve on the Court.

Senate cloture rules historically required a two-thirds affirmative vote to advance nominations to a vote; this was changed to a three-fifths supermajority in 1975. In November 2013, the then-Democratic Senate majority eliminated the filibuster for executive branch nominees and judicial nominees except for Supreme Court nominees by invoking the so-called nuclear option. In April 2017, the Republican Senate majority applied the nuclear option to Supreme Court nominations as well,[2] enabling the nominations of Trump nominees Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh to proceed to a vote.....

Hope this helps ;)

5 0
3 years ago
Question 10 (1 point)
ivann1987 [24]
They did not enter ww1 because B). “the allies were winning”
6 0
3 years ago
How did many southern states respond to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Brown?
Xelga [282]

Answer: 12

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
How did the Reform Act of 1832 change the organization of political power in England?
PIT_PIT [208]

Answer:

i dont know

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
What is one advantage a primary source has over a secondary source
aleksklad [387]
A primary source comes from a first-hand witness's point of view which makes the information from that source more valid than a secondary.
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The Federal Trade Act ______. limited the issuing of injunctions against unions allowed for cease-and-desist orders for unfair b
    6·1 answer
  • What aspects of the Jewish faith might have contributed to the dissatisfaction of many Jewish people living under Roman rule? Pi
    5·2 answers
  • Why did people begin to question the worth of slavery
    9·2 answers
  • The range of y=x3 is​
    14·2 answers
  • What is the main function of the chief justice of the supreme court? a. the chief justice presides over the court's public sessi
    14·1 answer
  • Why did W.E.B. DuBois leave the U.S. to move to Ghana?
    5·1 answer
  • Nineteenth century supporters of attempted to teach Native American children what?
    13·1 answer
  • What was the name given to the banning of alcoholic beverages?
    6·2 answers
  • The compromise of 1877 signaled an end to
    15·2 answers
  • Why do you think Moctezuma’s speech surprised Cortés?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!