1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pochemuha
3 years ago
11

List one negative impact of the Panama Canal to Indigenous peoples of Panama.

History
1 answer:
pogonyaev3 years ago
7 0
One negative impact would be people or citizens of the Panama would dislike that Indigenous people can come over into the Panama and the trading would extend until free trade without quotas or tariffs.
You might be interested in
Were hitlers land expansions stopped before he invaded Poland
kirza4 [7]

Answer:

No, instead they were simply put aside. When he invaded Poland,however the Allies finally took notice.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What type of person was Sir Robert Clive?
AveGali [126]

Answer:

A courageous, resourceful and ruthless military commander.

:)

6 0
3 years ago
which statement accurately compares the effects of the us civil war on the various social classes of south carolinas black popul
Galina-37 [17]

The civil war was fought in the United States of America. It was fought between Northern side of the country and the southern side of the country. But in sides of the condition of Africa Americans and the people who belonged to the black community was the same

4 0
2 years ago
PLEASE HURRY I GIVE BRAINLIEST IF YOU GET IT RIGHT
sammy [17]

Answer:

The correct answer is "The tale of Genji."

Explanation:

"The Tale of Genji" was written by Murasaki Shikibu.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What Supreme Court Case established the principle of judicial review
worty [1.4K]
On this day in 1803, the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John Marshall, decides the landmark case of William Marbury versus James Madison, Secretary of State of the United States and confirms the legal principle of judicial review–the ability of the Supreme Court to limit Congressional power by declaring legislation unconstitutional–in the new nation. The court ruled that the new president, Thomas Jefferson, via his secretary of state, James Madison, was wrong to prevent William Marbury from taking office as justice of the peace for Washington County in the District of Columbia. However, it also ruled that the court had no jurisdiction in the case and could not force Jefferson and Madison to seat Marbury. The Judiciary Act of 1789 gave the Supreme Court jurisdiction, but the Marshall court ruled the Act of 1789 to be an unconstitutional extension of judiciary power into the realm of the executive. In writing the decision, John Marshall argued that acts of Congress in conflict with the Constitution are not law and therefore are non-binding to the courts, and that the judiciary’s first responsibility is always to uphold the Constitution. If two laws conflict, Marshall wrote, the court bears responsibility for deciding which law applies in any given case. Thus, Marbury never received his job. Jefferson and Madison objected to Marbury’s appointment and those of all the so-called “midnight judges” appointed by the previous president, John Adams, after Jefferson was elected but mere hours before he took office. To further aggravate the new Democratic-Republican administration, many of these Federalist judges–although Marbury was not one of them–were taking the bench in new courts formed by the Judiciary Act, which the lame-duck Federalist Congress passed on February 13, 1801, less than a month before Jefferson’s inauguration on March 4. As part of the “Revolution of 1800,” President Thomas Jefferson and his Democratic-Republican followers launched a series of attacks against the Federalist-controlled courts. The new Democratic-Republican-controlled Congress easily eliminated most of the midnight judges by repealing the Judiciary Act in 1802. They impeached Supreme Court justice Samuel Chase, but acquitted him amidst inner-party squabbles. The Chase acquittal coupled with Marshall’s impeccably argued decision put an end to the Jeffersonian attack.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these descriptions portrays the "middle passage" in the triangular trade route of the colonists?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following conclusions regarding 17th-century Virginia is supported by the events of Bacon’s Rebellion?
    5·1 answer
  • Why were Jews and other "undesirables" first imprisoned in concentration camps in the early 1930s?
    9·2 answers
  • What caused hitler to enter politics
    7·1 answer
  • HEY guys, will you please help me? Thank you so much
    15·2 answers
  • Which group are the Caddoes, Wichitas, Cherokees, and the Alabamas and Coushattas a part of?
    12·2 answers
  • Why did Georgia governor Eugene Talmadge oppose President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal
    15·1 answer
  • When I respect others I...
    10·1 answer
  • Who issued the proclamation stating when to fly the flag at half-staff? when did this happen?
    7·1 answer
  • Explain the Muslim society & economy.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!