Answer:
A process designed to identify, qualify, and prioritize sales opportunities, whether they represent potential new customers or opportunities to generate additional business from existing customers
Explanation:
1) Generating Sales Leads
-Qualifying sales leads
2) Determining Sales Prospects
3) Prioritizing Sales Prospects
4) Preparing for Sales Dialogue
5) Remaining stages in the trust-based sales process
Answer:
Anyone who is injured by a defective product may sue the manufacturer, merchants, and all others who handled the product.
Explanation:
Strict liability means that an injured party may sue another even when they don not prove a case against them. A party is held liable for injuries from a certain activity.
For example a company that produces tools may be held liable when the machinery it produces causes injury during use by the injured party.
The injured party need not prove negligence of the defendant.
In this instance MakerMan Manufacturing is liable for the hammer that injured one of Rob's coworkers while they were using it.
Strict Liabilities are classified into 3: animals owned, product liability, and abnormally dangerous acts.
Answer:
a. micromarketing
Explanation:
Micromarketing -
It is the strategy of marketing , where the advertising is done on the basis of the location and the taste of the people , is referred to as micromarketing .
In this method ,
The ares are bifurcated into small regions , and for each and every region different method of marketing is used , depending on the people and location .
This enables to market the goods and services in a better manner .
Hence , from the given scenario of the question ,
The correct option is a. micromarketing .
Domestic business refers to the business where economic transactions are conducted within the geographical boundaries of the one country. International business refers to the business where economic transactions are conducted across border with several countries in the world.
Answer:
C)
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that they would not be subject to this if the common stock were owned by a partnership where Edwards is not a partner. Most likely if the stocks were divided between Fifty-five shareholders who are related neither to each other nor to Edward, in equal lots of 10 shares each.
