One major difference between Noah’s and Rector’s historical interpretation of the War on Poverty is Noah described poverty as a societal failure rather than personal moral failings.
Explanation:
In the interpretation of the war on poverty Noah and Rector does not possess same thinking. As Noah thought that poverty is a social curse in which one has nothing to do. War is one of the cause of financial crisis that led to poverty in the society. People used to lose their property, money everything in the war.
On the other side Rector do not think that poverty is a social curse. He thought that poverty is caused to anyone due to the failings of one's personal moral values. He thought poverty can be replenished if anyone's want. It has no power to be heavy on one's life.
The answer is C) The Southern colonies' economy had growing labor demands.
Crops like sugar cane, tobacco, and cotton took lots of physical labor to take care of and harvest. Plantations needed workers who they could work all the time and who would be cheap to buy.
Hope this helps! Please let me know if I'm wrong. :)
Answer:
The development of the Harlem renaissance led to the recognition of the significant influence of Black culture on American culture. For the first time, America saw not the humiliating stereotype of a black man, planted for decades in American culture, but the so-called “new black man” - an educated, highly cultured member of a truly decent society, and the Harlem renaissance was the first step to such recognition. The Harlem renaissance also set the stage for the further struggle of the African American population for their rights.
Explanation:
Answer:
wood
Explanation:
Ebony, wood of several species of trees of the genus Diospyros (family Ebenaceae), widely distributed in the tropics. The best is very heavy, almost black, and derived from heartwood only.