<em>Incomplete question, here some examples that shed light on the question</em><u>.</u>
<u>Answer:</u>
Here some topic examples according to Alex Schmid;
<u>Review of national terrorism prevention programs and policies in a comparative perspective;</u>
- <u>De-mobilisation of guerrilla and terrorist groups: best practices and lessons learned; </u>
- <u>Conspiracy theories related to (counter-) terrorism: is there a need for countering them?</u>
- <u>State human rights violations in response to terrorism – how widespread, how serious?;</u>
- <u>Kidnapping for ransom: the consequences of paying ransom and of refusals to pay.</u>
- <u>Careers of ex-terrorists and their role in countering terrorism;</u>
- <u>Terrorists released from prison: subsequent careers;</u>
- <u>The targeting logic of terrorist attacks;</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Note, Alex Schmid is of the view that certain topics as regards terrorism is been neglected or as he puts it; "Un- and Under-researched."
Thus, the topics listed above are hard-line areas that needs extensive research work inorder to reduce the effects of terrorism.
Answer:
you cant use this site for quizzes sorry
Explanation:
A, both objective descriptions and subjective commentaries.
Objective commentaries are ones without emotion or judgment. The narrator is describing just what he sees without any personal opinion thrown in. He does this when he describes the dust in the air.
Subjective commentaries include emotion and judgment. When the narrator summarizes the coach's statements there is personal opinion thrown in when he talks about "a pleasant formality".