Answer:
Explanation:
On March 4th, when Charlie took the Rorschach Test, he was supposed to view the images of the inkblots and freely imagine what he saw in them. But Charlie only saw the inkblots for what they were: blobs of ink. Even when Burt tells him to imagine, to pretend, to look for something there in the card, Charlie can't. He struggles to give a true description of the cards, pointing out how one was "a very nice pictur of ink with pritty points all around the eges," but again, this isn't the response that the psychologist is looking for.
Like ambiguously shaped clouds in which people "see" images of people and animals, the inkblots have enough random, busy shapes on them for people to interpret them as many different things--people, animals, scenes, conflicts, and so on. The idea is that the psychologist will pay attention to what a person thinks he or she sees in the inkblots, which is supposed to provide insight on what that person thinks and feels overall.
As a result of Charlie's inability to properly take this test, he worries that he's failed and that he won't be a candidate for the treatment to increase his intelligence. And while he gets frustrated with himself during the test, and while Burt seems to get almost angry--as evinced when his pencil point breaks--I wouldn't say that Charlie is angry in this situation.
But what this scene does reveal about his character is that perhaps he's already smarter than we expect. By insisting on seeing the inkblots for what they really are, and by failing to imagine scenes and images that are false or skewed, Charlie shows that he's not just honest but scrupulous. This early evidence of his good character foreshadows the upcoming conflicts he has with the men at the bakery as well as the researchers themselves, who are less scrupulous.
Well Julia was afraid of rats
A if you want to spend your money on i go with A
Answer:
Information access and management
Explanation:
Information access and management refers to "Developing an improved information-processing capability, including accurate and visible information, manipulability, exchangeability and ease of information transfer" as a primary goal for all IT functions in supporting collaboration.
The use of the phrase; "early diatribe about animal rights" in the philosophy assignment would not be plagiarism.
<h3>What is plagiarism?</h3>
Plagiarism is it's most primitive description is presenting another individual or group's work or ideas as one's own, with or without their consent, by incorporating it into one's work without full acknowledgement.
The above definition however includes not only published materials, but unpublished materials too.
However, in this scenario, only the phrase is used and not the English literature instructors idea.
Hence, it follows that the use of the phrase is not termed plagiarism as the phrase is the student does not state the author's idea about William Blake's "Auguries of Innocence".
Read more on plagiarism;
brainly.com/question/397668
#SPJ1
