1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alexandr402 [8]
3 years ago
9

With the refrence to the partition of india, reflect on (a) the role played by Muhammad ali jinnah, and (b) The content of the i

ndia independence act. ​
History
2 answers:
Akimi4 [234]3 years ago
8 0

Mohammed Ali Jinnah was an Indian politician who believed there could be Muslim Hindu unity but later was convinced that the partition was neccesary. The partition was the creation of two independent states, India and pakistan. The partition was made by Britain who shortly after withdrew from India. The partition was made to prevent religious conflict between Muslims and Hindus, with Muslims in Pakistan and Hindus in India. Mohammed Ali Jinnah is known as one of the people campaigning for the partition. He believed the partition was a necessary safeguard to the rights of muslims. He took part in negotiations with Britain for the partition to happen and later became the first Governor general of Pakistan and later died.

The India independence act was an act of Parliament that ended British rule in India and partitioned India into two independent countries. The partition was a result of the India Independence act and was approved and put into action into 1947.

denis23 [38]3 years ago
7 0
{\huge {\mathfrak {Answer :-}}}

{\mathfrak {\orange {Muhammed \: Ali \: Jinnah :}}}

First mentioned of Muslim representation in Congress came around 1890,Most of the senior leaders in congress were Hindus and there was a strong lobby of Hindu leaders.

Jinnah was highly qualified and he was himself a Atheist,as he use to smoke and drink alcohol which is against Islam,So people saying that Jinnah was a hardline follower of Islam is baseless.

Roles played by Jinnah are as follows -

➡️ Jinnah raised the issue of muslim interest but was suppressed by strong hindu lobby.

➡️ Gandhiji suggested that there should be diffrent party(Muslim League) for representation of Muslims but JINNAH said that religion cannot be the basis of forming a party and religion and politics should not be mixed.

➡️ Muslim league came into existance in 1906 to represent Indian Muslim . JINNAH still suggested that Muslim league will work with Congress and there should be two cabinet in the Government and two Constitution,One for Hindus and another for Muslims based on Shariah law but Nehru rejected the proposal as congress was in strong position.

➡️ Jinnah was never in the favour of two nation theory and religion based politics,he was forced by the circumstances.

{\mathbb{\red {Indian \: Independence \: Act :}}}

The Indian Independence Act, which was based on the Mountbatten plan of June 3, was passed by the British parliament on July 5, 1947 and received royal assent or approval on July 18, 1947.

Salient features of the Act :

➡️ The partition of the Indian state and the creation of Pakistan was to come into effect from August 15, 1947.

➡️ The British government were to officially give up every authority to these newly created dominions.

➡️ The new states were fully authorised to form their own constitution and constituent assemblies.

➡️ The Act had the entire procedure of transferring the powers to the constituent assemblies.

➡️ The states could opt out of the Commonwealth membership at any instance after independence.

➡️ A new Boundary Commission would be appointed to demarcate the line between the provinces of Punjab and Bengal.

➡️ Following the Act, the Radcliff Boundary Commission was appointed and the boundary line separating India and Pakistan was created.

➡️ Lord Mountbatten was the first Governor General of India, whereas Mohammad Ali Jinnah became the first Governor General of Pakistan.


REGARDS ARNAB ✌️, \\THANK YOU
You might be interested in
What where three differences between the north and the south before the civil war?
Eva8 [605]
North- union
south- confederate

north - anti slavery ( abolitionists)
south- pro slavery

north- 22 states
south- 11 state a

Please vote my answer branliest! Thanks.
3 0
3 years ago
1.
Lerok [7]

Answer:

Enjoy.

Explanation:

1. C. Holy land

2. C. Only one god

3. C. each religion

4. D. one day

5. D. France

6. B. expansion

7. B. He stopped

8. A. the battle

9. D. islamic

10. A. Muhammad

11-13 Were answered on the last one

7 0
3 years ago
Why might the German people be angry over the Treaty of Versailles?
bezimeni [28]

Answer:

The Germans hated the Treaty of Versailles because they had not been allowed to take part in the Conference. ... Germany had to pay £6,600 million 'reparations', a huge sum which Germans felt was just designed to destroy their economy and starve their children. Finally, Germans hated the loss of land.

Explanation:

HOPE THIS HELPS SS!

5 0
3 years ago
Compare the lives of black Americans prior to the civil rights movement to the lives of black South Africans living under aparth
HACTEHA [7]
The segregation began in 1948 after the National Party came to power. The nationalist political party instituted policies of white supremacy, which empowered white South Africans who descended from both Dutch and British settlers in South Africa while further disenfranchising black Africans.

The system was rooted in the country’s history of colonization and slavery. White settlers had historically viewed black South Africans as a natural resource to be used to turn the country from a rural society to an industrialized one. Starting in the 17th century, Dutch settlers relied on slaves to build up South Africa. Around the time that slavery was abolished in the country in 1863, gold and diamonds were discovered in South Africa.

Many white women in South Africa learned how to use firearms for self-protection in the event of racial unrest in 1961, when South Africa became a republic.
Many white women in South Africa learned how to use firearms for self-protection in the event of racial unrest in 1961, when South Africa became a republic.
Dennis Lee Royle/AP Photo
That discovery represented a lucrative opportunity for white-owned mining companies that employed—and exploited—black workers. Those companies all but enslaved black miners while enjoying massive wealth from the diamonds and gold they mined. Like Dutch slave holders, they relied on intimidation and discrimination to rule over their black workers.


The mining companies borrowed a tactic that earlier slaveholders and British settlers had used to control black workers: pass laws. As early as the 18th century, these laws had required members of the black majority, and other people of color, to carry identification papers at all times and restricted their movement in certain areas. They were also used to control black settlement, forcing black people to reside in places where their labor would benefit white settlers.

A “natives” colored white society. Though apartheid was supposedly designed to allow different races to develop on their own, it forced black South Africans into poverty and hopelessness. “Grand” apartheid laws focused on keeping black people in their own designated “homelands.” And “petty” apartheid laws focused on daily life restricted almost every facet of black life in South Africa.


Children from the townships of Langa and Windermere scavenging close to Cape Town, in February 1955.
Children from the townships of Langa and Windermere scavenging close to Cape Town, in February 1955.
Bela Zola/Mirrorpix/Getty Images
Pass laws and apartheid policies prohibited black people from entering urban areas without immediately finding a job. It was illegal for a black person not to carry a passbook. Black people could not marry white people. They could not set up businesses in white areas. Everywhere from hospitals to beaches was segregated. Education was restricted. And throughout the 1950s, the NP passed law after law regulating the movement and lives of black people.

Though they were disempowered, black South Africans protested their treatment within apartheid. In the 1950s, the African National Congress, the country’s oldest black political party, initiated a mass mobilization against the racists laws, called the Defiance Campaign. Black workers boycotted white businesses, went on strike, and staged non-violent protests.

A crowd at a Johannesburg protest meeting which defied a ban on such gatherings, circa 1952.
A crowd at a Johannesburg protest meeting which defied a ban on such gatherings, circa 1952.
Popperfoto/Getty Images
These acts of defiance were met with police and state brutality. Protesters were beaten and tried en masse in unfair legal proceedings. But though the campaigns took a toll on black protesters, they didn’t generate enough international pressure on the South African government to inspire reforms.

In 1960, South African police killed 69 peaceful protesters in Sharpeville, sparking nationwide dissent and a wave of strikes. A subgroup of protesters who were tired of what they saw as ineffective nonviolent protests began to embrace armed resistance instead. Among them was Nelson Mandela, who helped organize a paramilitary subgroup of the ANC in 1960. He was arrested for treason in 1961, and was sentenced to life in prison for charges of sabotage in 1964.

30,000 protestors march from Langa into Cape Town in South Africa, to demand the release of prisoners in 1960. The prisoners were arrested for protesting against the segregationist pass laws.
30,000 protestors march from Langa into Cape Town in South Africa, to demand the release of prisoners in 1960. The prisoners were arrested for protesting against the segregationist pass.
8 0
4 years ago
Write two ways that the free enterprise system works to break the three powers noted of monopolies (Higher prices, Barriers to e
SOVA2 [1]
In a truly free market society where the government does not artificially create monopolies then there will exist natural monopolies which are the result of consumers valuing the product of one service provider over the other. These natural monopolies have no government support to maintain their monopoly status. If their product fails to meet consumer demands then there will exist an opportunity for competition to enter the market. Without government regulations hindering the process the costs of goods can be naturally lowered through competition and natural monopolies.
3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • which choices will help you cut back on expenses so that you can spend more money on promotions or advertising check all that ap
    9·2 answers
  • Which european explorer stated, "god made me the messenger of the new heaven and the new earth of which he spoke in the apocalyp
    6·1 answer
  • Brass instruments did not acquire valves until the _____________ century.
    15·1 answer
  • What north American resources were important to the Spanish, the French, and the english?
    15·1 answer
  • The term melting pot accurately describes which of the following?
    11·2 answers
  • How did the rule of dictator General Porfirio Díaz contribute to economic and political instability in Mexico?
    5·2 answers
  • Judaism is historically important because it ia the first ______ religion.
    14·2 answers
  • Which government official was the leader of the anti-Communist crusade of
    8·1 answer
  • What effect did old colonial boundaries have on newly independent African states?
    13·1 answer
  • Explain why communism appealed to the average Russian before the Revolution.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!