Answer: $23571
Explanation:
For this question, we have to calculate the present value of $27,000 with the given rate and the time that have already been given in the question to know the worth tiday. This will then be:
= $27,000 x PVIF (7%, 2)
= $27,000 x 0.873
= $23,571
Due to changes in production, Hanson steel gave each employee 75 percent of the cost savings. Hanson steel uses a <u>gainsharing </u>compensation plan.
A compensation plan refers to the practices, methods, and intentional approach that's used by an organization in maintaining financial interests and developing, retaining, attracting, and rewarding employees in an industry.
It should be noted that the gainsharing compensation plan refers to a compensation plan that is used to increase profitability as employees share in the company's gain. Since the workers share 75% of the cost savings, this is a gain-sharing compensation plan.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25356534
Answer:
The answer is option C. achieve economies of scope.
Explanation:
An Economies of scope is a proportionate saving gained by producing two or more distinct goods, when the cost of doing so is less than that of producing each separately.
Based on the scenario portrayed in the question, the office management firm is hoping to achieve economies of scope.
Answer:
New-Task.
Explanation:
New-task purchase is that purchase made by a business of which need has not arisen before. The business didn't made decision to make purchase for this new product or purchase before. The new-task purchase decision is made by the business when a need to purchase is perceived internally or by the clients.
In the given scenario, the need to purchase 'cars as part of its sales compensation' defines the criteria of new-task purchase. In this case, Capitol's need to buy or add 'cars' into its sales compensation represents need to make 'New-task purchase.'
Therefore, the correct answer is new-task purchase.
Leadership is not needed when:
- It will make processes inefficient due to time wasting
- It is being used to oppress people
- Subordinates don't need leadership
Leadership is usually quite good as it can galvanize subordinates to be better workers due to better organization as well as inspiration.
There are instances where it is not needed however such as when:
- It slows down processes - sometimes leaders will need to give permission for a subordinate to do something. If this thing is time conscious and the leader is not available to give their ascent, the whole process could suffer.
- It oppresses people - when a leader is an oppressive one and acts in such a way that their subordinates suffer, that leadership is not needed.
- Subordinates are fine without it - sometimes workers have the necessary skills and experience to operate independently without a leader. In such a case, a leader is not needed.
In conclusion, while a leader is quite important in many ways, there can be situations where it is best that they are not used.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/24150490.</em>
