1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dahasolnce [82]
3 years ago
7

Rochester plc acquired 90% of the common shares and 10% of the 5% bonds in Paris Ltd on 31 March 2019. All income and expenses a

re deemed to accrue evenly through the year. On 31 January 2019 Rochester sold Paris goods for $6,000 plus a mark-up of one-third. 75% of these goods were still in stock at the end of the year. There was a goodwill impairment loss of $4,000. On December31,2019 Rochester increased its non-current assets by $15,000 on revaluation.
Set out below are the individual statements of comprehensive income of Rochester and Paris:

Statements of comprehensive income for the year ended 31 December 2019
Rochester Paris
$ $
Net turnover 100,000 60,000
Cost of sales 30,000 30,000
Gross profit 70,000 30,000
Expenses 20,541 15,000
Interest payable on 5% bonds 5,000
Interest receivable on Paris Ltd bonds 500 _____
49,959 10,000
Dividends received 2,160 -----
Profit before tax 52,119 10,000
Income tax expense 7,002 3,000
Profit for the period 45,117 7,000

Required:
a.)Prepare a consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the year ended 31
December 2019. Show all relevant workings
b.)Explain how unrealised profits arise from transactions between companies in a group and
why it is important to remove them
English
2 answers:
jek_recluse [69]3 years ago
7 0
I think The answer is B
nika2105 [10]3 years ago
5 0
Snjsjskskaksnnsjshebeebebsnsj
You might be interested in
Persuasive/Argumentative Essay Writing Part 1
ArbitrLikvidat [17]
Hello, so this seems to be a basic essay! Which is good news. First, pick your argument/ topic choice one that you feel you relate to and one that you can easily covey your message to the reader. You seemed to have six really great choices to choose from so thank your teacher for that! All you need to do is get all of your information and create a outline. One that shows all of you reasoning and facts. It looks like you have all the information that you need in the pictures you have. Unfortunately, I can’t write this for you but trust me I would love to! Let me know if you need any further help with anything at all. Good luck on you essay!
8 0
2 years ago
Which answer choice does not contain any errors in capitalization?
Nastasia [14]
D. because it has no errors


8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The second major detail of the paragraph begins in sentence <br><br> A. 2<br> B. 3<br> D. 4
Elis [28]
I believe it would be in the 3rd sentence
3 0
3 years ago
A
nekit [7.7K]

Answer:

A sentence?

Explanation:

sorry if its wrong, are there multiple choice answers?

3 0
2 years ago
Compose a seven to nine sentence response to the prompt: How would you compare Zimbardo’s argument that situations cause people
8_murik_8 [283]

In the first text, Zimbardo argues that people are neither "good" or "bad." Zimbardo's main claim is that the line between good and evil is movable, and that anyone can cross over under the right circumstances. He tells us that:

"That line between good and evil is permeable. Any of us can move across it....I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil--to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein. It's the situation that brings that out."

Zimbardo argues that people can move across this line due to phenomena such as deindividualization, anonymity of place, dehumanization, role-playing and social modeling, moral disengagement and group conformity.

On the other hand, Nietzsche in "Morality as Anti-Nature" also argues that all men are capable of good and evil, and that evil is therefore a "natural" part of people. However, his opinion is different from Zimbardo in the sense that Nietzsche believes that judging people as "good" and "bad" is pointless because morality is anti-natural, and we have no good reason to believe that our behaviour should be modified to fit these precepts.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which elements of a text are most helpful in determining the authors point of view about the topic?
    13·1 answer
  • There are 5 fish and 2 of them druned how many fish are there now?
    6·2 answers
  • The greatest misfortune is that Englishmen and their Indian associates in the administration of the country do not know that the
    11·2 answers
  • What is Lincoln's purpose in the excerpt?
    6·1 answer
  • The contrast between what is said and what is meant is called..
    9·1 answer
  • Which phrase contains an example of alliteration? A.) Swim off with sure strokes, B.) an ox to a heavy cart, C.) jump into work
    8·1 answer
  • Help me please !i’ll give brainliest
    9·1 answer
  • Which sentence from paragraph 3 of "Understanding Carbon Offsets" contains an example of faulty reasoning?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the 11/12+(−71/2)
    5·2 answers
  • How does Wiesel connect the events with his views on God as the book progresses? What evidence reveals this?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!