1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sladkaya [172]
3 years ago
7

Who do historians consider the winner of the War of 1812, and why?

History
2 answers:
Degger [83]3 years ago
3 0
<span>The Americans, because they kicked the British out of North America.

Hope this helps.
</span>
Readme [11.4K]3 years ago
3 0
Historians say that Canada really won because conquest of Canada became an objective for the US, but Canada stayed intact, so they won, although the Americans thought they won. I may be wrong, hope I was able to help.
You might be interested in
Who was Akbar and what is he well known for
chubhunter [2.5K]
The answer to your question is:
 
Jalaluddin Mohammad Akbar was d 3rd Mughal emperor of India during 16th century. Ruled for 56 years. Unification of political India & removal of religion from d court was his biggest achievement. Fatehpur sikri near Agra & Lahore fort were his creations. His empire was spread from Kabul to Dhaka & Kashmir to Kerala.<span>
</span>
8 0
3 years ago
What South Vietnamese leader was overthrown in 1963 in a coup?
Komok [63]
Ngo Dinh Diem was a Vietnamese president from 1955 to 1963, in 1963 he was assassinated with his brother Ngo Dinh Nhu.

Hope that helps
7 0
3 years ago
The largest European city which is not actually the capital of a country is:
True [87]
Hamburg is the largest city in Europe that is not the capital of a country.
4 0
3 years ago
Where did Hammurabi get his power as a king
Zinaida [17]
He got his powered from god
5 0
3 years ago
How many major systems of philosophy exist in Buddhism. I need long answer
Leto [7]

<span>As we have seen, several periods of thought emerged in the process of Buddhist development. At least two major systems of thought, roughly speaking, closely related to what we call the primitive Buddhism and the developed Buddhism. The first is the Buddhist history of thoughts, as defined by Buddhologists such as academician  Theodor Stcherbatsky (1866-1942); this division relied on different periods in the whole process of development of Buddhist thoughts. Second is the history of thoughts of Buddhist Schools, which includes several Buddhist schools; thus, you need to have time to study doctrines of each single school (e.g., Zen, </span><span>Pure Land</span>, or Tendai). Buddhism in China, for example, includes at least ten different schools, and each school also has its own system of thoughts and exclusive methods of practice.

<span>We may generally divide the first major system, the Buddhist history of thoughts, into two major categories based on history: a) Buddhist thoughts in the primitive period and b) Buddhist thoughts in the periods of development. Buddhist thoughts in the primitive period were established on the foundational teachings of Dependent Origination and non-self, which were taught directly by the Buddha after his attainment of ultimate enlightenment. The central content of these teachings explain that all existences (dharmas) in the three worlds—senses-sphere realm, fine form realm, and formless realm[3]— are nothing but the products of inter-beings from multi-conditions. They appear in either cosmic mode (e.g., institution, existence, transformation, and destruction) or in the flux of mental transformation (e.g., birth, being, alteration, and death). In this way, all things—both the physical and the mental—are born and die endlessly, dependent on multiple conditions in the cycle of samsāra. All that is present through this Law of Dependent Origination is, therefore, impermanent, ever-changing, and without any immortal entity whatsoever that is independent and perpetual__. This is the truth of reality through which the Buddha affirmed that “whether the Buddha appears or not, the reality of dharmas is always as such.” Based upon this fundamental teaching, Buddhists built for themselves an appropriate view of personal life and spiritual practice: the liberated life of non-self—the end goal of the spiritual journey.</span>

<span>Although Buddhist thought in periods of development were gradually formed by various schools, two prominent systems of philosophy emerged: the Mādhyamika and the Yogācāra. Both these two philosophical systems related strictly to the primitive thought of Paticcamūpāda; however, each system has its own approach to interpretations and particular concepts. The Mādhyamika developed the doctrine of Emptiness (Śūnyatā), while the Yogācāra instituted the teaching of Mind-only (Vijñapati-mātratā), emphasizing the concept of Ālaya (store consciousness). The doctrine of Emptiness focuses on explaining that the nature of all dharmas is emptiness of essence and that all dharmas are non-self by nature and existences are but manifestations of conditional elements. Thus, when a practitioner penetrates deeply into the realm of Emptiness, he or she simultaneously experiences the reality of the non-self. However, you should remember that the concept of Emptiness used here does not refer to any contradictory categories in the dualistic sphere, such as ‘yes’ and ‘no’ or ‘to be’ and ‘not to be.’ Rather, it indicates the state of true reality that goes beyond the world of dualism. For this reason, in the canonical languages of Mahāyāna Buddhism, the term Emptiness is used as a synonym for Nirvāna. In the Yogācāra philosophy, the concept of Ālaya—the most fundamental issue of this system of thought—points out that all problems of both suffering and happiness are the very outcomes of mental distinctions (vikalpa) between subject (atman) and object (dharma), or between self and other. This mental distinction is the root of all afflictions, birth-death, and samsāra. Thus, in the path of spiritual training, a practitioner must cleanse all attachments to self as it embodies what we call the ‘I’, ‘mine’, and ‘my self’ in order to return to the realm of pure mind, which is non-distinct by nature.</span>

<span>Based on what has been discussed here, clearly the consistency in Buddhist thoughts—whether origin or development—is that all teachings focus on purification of craving, hatred, and attachment to self in order to reach the reality of true liberation: the state of non-self or Nirvāna.</span>

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Identify three opinions stated in the Gettysburg Address and state whether or not each opinion is substantiated.
    14·1 answer
  • Who was responsible for the spread of the muslim realms to egypt and persia?
    11·1 answer
  • The Boxer Rebellion in 1900 was an attempt to..
    15·2 answers
  • What was the Goliad massacre?
    8·2 answers
  • How did Martin Luther King Jr's act in the civil rights affect america?
    8·2 answers
  • What was the main purpose of the declaration of the rights of man?
    7·2 answers
  • Under which circumstance is Congress most likely to pass a bill the president has threatened to veto?
    6·2 answers
  • Help me with this please
    11·1 answer
  • Some of the wisest proverbs are in the Bible.<br><br> True<br> False
    5·1 answer
  • Which of these is not a reason the South was so successful in growing crops?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!