The assignment wants to know how you would write a story based on a historical period of your choice. As I cannot know which period you prefer, I cannot write your answer, but I will help you to write it.
<h3>Steps to present an effective story</h3>
- Enter the historical period of interest to you.
- Show what makes this period interesting and why it would be important to your story.
- Show the context of your story.
- Show how the main character is important to this story.
- Show the location and conflicts that the story would present.
- Show why your readers would be interested.
You can search for important historical moments to identify one that sparks your interest. You must research this period to promote historically correct ideas, even if your story is fiction.
Here is an example of what your answer should look like:
<em>My story would take place at the time of colonization when European pilgrims settled in America and had to dispute territory with the indigenous people. In this story, my main character would be an indigenous hero, who would organize a resistance group in his tribe, to fight the Europeans and protect his people from exploitation and extermination. The story's conflict would be established between the Indians and the Europeans and the story would have many scenes of struggle and action. I believe that this story would be interesting for the reader because we know little from the indigenous point of view since what happened in this period was told by Europeans.</em>
Learn more about what is fiction:
brainly.com/question/27926526
#SPJ1
Answer:
- Roosevelt appeals to the emotions of the audience by referring to Hitler’s rise to power and the tragic consequences of his government.
- Roosevelt appeals to the logic of the audience by noting that the interests of the people are not considered in a one-party government.
- Roosevelt appeals to the logic of the audience by explaining reasons why the amendment would allow the Soviets to ignore a human right.
In this excerpt, Eleanor Roosevelt explains why a compromise on human rights issues is often equivalent to nullifying the protection. She does this by first describing an issue in which compromising (with the Soviets) would eliminate the protection of the right. She also appeals to the logic of the listeners when she explains that in one-party systems, the rights of citizens are often ignored. Finally, she emphasizes this fact by reminding the reader of Hitler's regime and its consequences.
Answer:
It is C. for me
Explanation:
The other ones are using passive voice because the subject is a recipient of a verb's action.
Answer:the ice is though heavy but! Not all heavy items sink and therefore upthrust is much more than gravity in water
Explanation:ice is a solid and it overcomes the gravity in water and due to alot of upthrust the ice stays afloat with out sinking due to the pull of gravity which water weakens it.
