Answer:
no
Explanation:
because the crisis that was going on was in extreme measures and was a massive issue, if there was a issue as great as slavery then yes, but they need to have a amazing reason for it and congress should vote on it
The railroad made it possible to colonize the West, offered new economic opportunities, sparked community and town growth, and generally connected the nation.
<h3>
What are railroads?</h3>
Railroad, a kind of land transportation using self-contained engines or locomotives to pull flange-wheeled vehicles over two parallel steel rails or tracks. In the 16th century, railroads were first constructed in European mines using cars pulled by people or animals. The modern railroad evolved swiftly after the steam locomotive was invented and the first railway was built in 1825. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad, the country's first railroad, started construction in 1828. Specialized railroad vehicles, such as the sleeper cars created by George Pullman in 1859, were constructed to convey both freight and passengers. The railroad impacted every nation's economic and social growth during the 19th century.
When the transcontinental railroad was finished in the United States in 1869, it marked the start of a period of railroad growth and consolidation that included such business titans as Cornelius Vanderbilt, Jay Gould, Edward H. Harriman, James J. Hill, and Leland Stanford. The railroad's significance in the United States started to decline in the early 20th century, although it is still crucial for international travel in Europe, Asia, and Africa. Additionally, see Trans-Siberian Railroad and Orient Express.
To learn more about the, railroads visit:
brainly.com/question/1130094
#SPJ4
for the most part, historians view Andrew Johnson as the worst possible person to have served as President at the end of the American Civil War. Because of his gross incompetence in federal office and his incredible miscalculation of the extent of public support for his policies, Johnson is judged as a great failure in making a satisfying and just peace. He is viewed to have been a rigid, dictatorial racist who was unable to compromise or to accept a political reality at odds with his own ideas. Instead of forging a compromise between Radical Republicans and moderates, his actions united the opposition against him. His bullheaded opposition to the Freedmen's Bureau Bill, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and the Fourteenth Amendment eliminated all hope of using presidential authority to affect further compromises favorable to his position. In the end, Johnson did more to extend the period of national strife than he did to heal the wounds of war.
Most importantly, Johnson's strong commitment to obstructing political and civil rights for blacks is principally responsible for the failure of Reconstruction to solve the race problem in the South and perhaps in America as well. Johnson's decision to support the return of the prewar social and economic system—except for slavery—cut short any hope of a redistribution of land to the freed people or a more far-reaching reform program in the South.
Historians naturally wonder what might have happened had Lincoln, a genius at political compromise and perhaps the most effective leader to ever serve as President, lived. Would African Americans have obtained more effective guarantees of their civil rights? Would Lincoln have better completed what one historian calls the "unfinished revolution" in racial justice and equality begun by the Civil War? Almost all historians believe that the outcome would have been far different under Lincoln's leadership.
Among historians, supporters of Johnson are few in recent years. However, from the 1870s to around the time of World War II, Johnson enjoyed high regard as a strong-willed President who took the courageous high ground in challenging Congress's unconstitutional usurpation of presidential authority. In this view, much out of vogue today, Johnson is seen to have been motivated by a strict constructionist interpretation of the Constitution and by a firm belief in the separation of powers. This perspective reflected a generation of historians who were critical of Republican policy and skeptical of the viability of racial equality as a national policy. Even here, however, apologists for Johnson acknowledge his inability to effectively deal with congressional challenges due to his personal limitations as a leader.
the Red Scare refers to a period of political and cultural instability in the United States during the late 1940s and the 1950s wherein the United States was so fearful of communists in their midst due to a Cold War with the United States that neighbors informed on neighbors and people were blacklisted from employment.
