Answer:
he states how the men look and says that they do not belong in the North.
Explanation:
THIS IS THE COMPLETE QUESTION BELOW
Read this excerpt from The Call of the Wild.
Charles was a middle-aged, lightish-colored man, with weak and watery eyes and a mustache that twisted fiercely and vigorously up, giving the lie to the limply drooping lip it concealed. Hal was a youngster of nineteen or twenty . . . . Both men were manifestly out of place, and why such as they should adventure the North is part of the mystery of things that passes understanding.Readers can tell that London is using direct characterization to describe Charles and Hal because he
✓✓Direct characterization can be regarded as method that describe a particular character in a manner that is in straightforward, this could be physical description(watery eyes ) or line of work ( doctor).
The Call of the Wild was written by Jack London, it is an adventure novel arround year 1903. From the excerpt Charles was characterized as one with
watery eyes and lightish-colored man, Hal who was also a youngster, all these gives example of direct characterization. Alot of Jack London works was dedicated to mysteries of the wild. It should be noted that Readers can tell that London is using direct characterization to describe Charles and Hal because he states how the men look and says that they do not belong in the North.
I would say A)...
The topic of three styles of dog training can be broken down into many sub-categories. A topical pattern of organization organizes the information into subtopics.
1) A
2) E
3) A
4) B
-not totally sure but these seem like the best ones-
Answer:
4. Hypothesize.
Explanation:
Some scientists<u><em> hypothesize </em></u> that by sensing a change in barometric pressure or electricity, certain species of fish may be able to portend seismic events; just before a recent earthquake, several fish were observed leaping into the air from the ocean.
The answer cannot be repudiate for it means that the facts or information/ claim is rejected. Authorize, foresee, question and contend are also wrong as they do not support the claim that follows in the next words.
