1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Jobisdone [24]
3 years ago
7

What was the difference in electoral counts between George w Bush and al gore during the 200 presidential campaign

History
1 answer:
sleet_krkn [62]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

In the national popular vote, <u>Gore</u> received <u><em>48.4 percent</em></u> while <u>Bush</u> received <u><em>47.9</em></u>, <em>losing by over 540,000 votes</em>. U.S. presidents, however, are chosen by the Electoral College, a system in which “electoral votes” are assigned to states based on their population and then awarded as a lump sum to the winner of the popular vote in that state – currently, it takes 270 electoral votes to win. By the end of Election Night, 2000, <em><u>Gore’s tally stood at 250 and Bush’s stood at 246 with Oregon</u></em>, Wisconsin and Florida too close to call.

You might be interested in
As a result of the Revolutionary War, the British agreed to
jenyasd209 [6]

Answer:

Let colonists have the land of America

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Which word best describes president nixon's strategy in dealing with the russians in his second administration?
mestny [16]
The answer is "<span>Negotiation".

</span><span>Richard Milhous Nixon who became the president of the United States of America from 1969 until 1974 was the thirty-seventh President of the country. He is the only president in American History who resigned from his office instead of reaching the full time of the Presidency.</span><span />
4 0
3 years ago
Why claudette colvin's actions remain little known today​
timofeeve [1]

Answer:

Explanation:

The author feels that the activists of that time didn't feel like a teenager would be a good icon for a movement. So, Claudette Colvin's action still remain little known today.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What’s Alexander Hamilton least important contribution
SCORPION-xisa [38]

Answer:in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

6 0
2 years ago
How were acculturation and patriarchy linked in the Spanish colonies? What resistance was there to Spanish cultural, political,
mixer [17]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

How were acculturation and patriarchy linked in the Spanish colonies?

Acculturation was one of the first things that Spaniards wanted to permeate in the Native Mesoamerican Indians in order to transmit their religious teachings and make the Indians receptive to the evangelization of the Catholic church principle.

Patriarchy was also one of the things that came from the social structure of Spain, in which the father figure was the most important in the Spanish family. The father was the "chief figure" in the family, the provider. The mother was the one who stayed at home, raising children, and taking care of the house.

What resistance was there to Spanish cultural, political, economic acculturation?

Practically, the Native Indians opposed every Spanish imposition for the simple reason that those elements were not part of their culture. Spaniards tried to change the Indian's religion, social customs, and approach to life. And of course, Mesoamerican Indians opposed every inch to it.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 50 words on how Betsy Ross and the American flag relates to the feminist movement of today.
    11·1 answer
  • How did the rise of nation-states make sea exploration possible?
    8·1 answer
  • What ancient civilizations practiced sikhism?
    11·1 answer
  • After the Maurya dynasty in India what dynasty came to power?
    14·1 answer
  • Which statement about Confucianism is accurate? According to Confucianism, all people are essentially good. According to Confuci
    12·2 answers
  • Who united ancient Egypt? A. Narmer B. Zoser C. Tutankhamen D. Amenhotep IV
    13·2 answers
  • What is cronyism?
    11·2 answers
  • The outcome of the Brown v. Board decision was that...
    10·1 answer
  • How does this document/picture help explain the reasons for the decline of the Roman Empire?
    9·2 answers
  • Who was the 19th president of the united states?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!