What was the purpose for the attack on pearl harbor

2 answers:

6 0

The purpose for the attack on pearl harbor was so that the Japanese military can destroy "the knife pointed to Japan's throat" or the US Navy. The US navy at the time was one of the few things that could have stopped the Japanese expansion in a fight, and with the US asking them to stop, they knew that they would have to fight sooner or later. The attack on Pearl harbor was also a way to get the US "awakened" to their surroundings, and to have them join as Japan's ally (which backfired tremedously)

hope this helps

soldi70 [24.7K]3 years ago

5 0

The purpose of the Pearl Harbor attack was to prevent the U.S. from getting involved in Japan's planned military actions in Southeast Asia and various Allied power's territories. The attack was supposed to intimidate the United States into inaction, not inflame tensions or initiate a truce between Japan and the United States. This obviously didn't work at all.

You might be interested in

Bruh, yah need to help me with this one... I am dumb on history :/ and I'll put 30 points on this thing, it better worth it

jekas [21]

Answer:

A or B

Explanation:

heres the preamble

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

6 0

3 years ago

What did Aristotle think of democracy?

Tems11 [23]

In his Politics, Aristotle divides government into 6 kinds, 3 good and 3 bad. The good forms are monarchy, aristocracy, and polity, while the bad forms are tyranny, oligarchy, and democracy. Each of the good forms has the possibility of turning into its bad form - i.e., monarchy into tyranny, aristocracy into oligarchy.

Seeing that democracy is listed in the "bad camp", people automatically assume that Aristotle was anti-democratic. But this is an over-simplification.

By democracy, Aristotle really means mob rule. Polity corresponds more to what we'd think of as modern democracy - a stable, orderly institution that represents and protects the people. For instance, polity is what existed in Athens during its Golden Age. Aristotle didn't oppose this by any means.

Indeed, unlike his teacher Plato, who sought to create an ideal model of the state ruled by philosopher-kings, Aristotle thought that the best form of government was determined by the situation. For a virtuous people, polity could very well be the best form of government; for a subservient people (and Aristotle believed that such people existed), monarchy or tyranny might be the natural state of affairs.

3 0

3 years ago

Whats the answer? im not sure if my andwer is correct

natka813 [3]

Its really c because it would make more sense with a representative.

4 0

4 years ago

Which 17th century enlightenment philosophers inspired the ideas in the declaration?

Svetradugi [14.3K]

Answer:

Most scholars today believe that Jefferson derived the most famous ideas in the Declaration of Independence from the writings of English philosopher John Locke. Locke wrote his Second Treatise of Government in 1689 at the time of England's Glorious Revolution, which overthrew the rule of James II.

7 0

3 years ago

How did the public genuinely react to the supreme courts ruling on Scott’s v. Sandford?

Stolb23 [73]

Answer:

answer d

Explanation:

people in the south favored the decision because they could take their slaves to the North. The north feared this decision because they thought slavery would become legal everywhere

8 0

3 years ago