Answer:General Wolfe had soldiers on both land and water to take defeat the French
Explanation:
On September 13, 1759, the British under General James Wolfe (1727-59) achieved a dramatic victory when they scaled the cliffs over the city of Quebec to defeat French forces under Louis-Joseph de Montcalm on the Plains of Abraham (an area named for the farmer who owned the land
The arabs opposed it after WW1 because arabs made up the majority of the population of Palestine, and they were never asked whether they wanted their land to be a national home for outsiders.
Darwinism, as you probably know, is the idea that creatures grow and adapt to all the stresses of life and our wolrd and in doing so, allow future generations to flourish.
Survival of the fittest was not Darwin's quote, but rather Herbert Spencer's, who said that if things need to change to survive, than those creatures we see today must have been the ones who changed the best, or were the fittest to survive. He created social Darwinism, saying that governments should not restrict big businesses, because those businesses that are fit and ready to survive will, and those who aren't won't.
In America, we used that with our racial issues by saying that the race that is physically sstronger and ready to adapt to its environment (whities), will find success, and those who fail socially (darkies) must have been inferior. It justified putting down minorities.
Answer:
F
Explanation:
Britain didn't pay a lot of attention to the colonies so they grew apart and felt like they could no longer relate. This feeling was strengthened during the French-Indian war because Americans saw British soldiers and resented how they acted.
Egypt and Kush civilizations had many similarities.
Both of them were situated in Africa. The former in the north and the Kush in the south. They both lived along the river Nile.
They both built pyramids, but the Kushian ones were very steep.
Both of them had similar religious believes and worshiped the same Gods.
Besides, they both used hieroglyphics as a way of writing.
Apart from the similarities, for hundreds of years their relationship was mainly based on economics.
