1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kozerog [31]
3 years ago
7

How are the governments of Jordan and Kuwait different from the governments of the United Arab Emirates and Oman

History
1 answer:
Afina-wow [57]3 years ago
7 0

There's multiple differences in the government systems in the countries of Jordan and Kuwait on one side, and the United Arab Emirates and Oman on the other side.

Jordan and Kuwait are both countries that have parliamentary monarchies. They have a Prime Minister that is the head of the country, and also there's a multiparty system, so the people can vote for their leader.

The United Arab Emirates and Oman, on the other hand, are countries that have constitutional monarchies. The monarch is leading the country, and it is not the people that have their say in the choice by voting, instead, it is the only the high class representatives of the society that vote for who will lead the country.

You might be interested in
The Swahili Coast was a marketplace for traders from which locations? Check all that apply.
____ [38]
The correct answers are Arabia, Asia, and North Africa. Other countries, especially European ones, went to other places to do their trading business, many times not even knowing that some of their goods came from the Swahili Coast.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Would it violate the law if you dont go to church and stay home?
Juliette [100K]

First, if you’re a Christian, church is not something you go to. It’s something you are. You can’t disassociate from the church as a Christian any more than you can disassociate from humanity as a person. You don’t go to church. You arethe church. You don't go to church. You are the church.

8 0
2 years ago
How did the Europeans obtain their slaves
Vedmedyk [2.9K]

During the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, European traders started to get involved in the Slave Trade. European traders had previously been interested in African nations and kingdoms, such as Ghana and Mali, due to their sophisticated trading networks. Traders then wanted to trade in human beings.


They took enslaved people from western Africa to Europe and the Americas. At first this was on quite a small scale but the Slave Trade grew during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, as European countries conquered many of the Caribbean islands and much of North and South America.


Europeans who settled in the Americas were lured by the idea of owning their own land and were reluctant to work for others. Convicts from Britain were sent to work on the plantations but there were never enough so, to satisfy the tremendous demand for labour, planters purchased slaves.


They wanted the enslaved people to work in mines and on tobacco plantations in South America and on sugar plantations in the West Indies. Millions of Africans were enslaved and forced across the Atlantic, to labour in plantations in the Caribbean and America.


Slavery changed when Europeans became involved, as it led to generation after generation of peoples being taken from their homelands and enslaved forever. It led to people being legally defined as chattel slaves.


A chattel slave is an enslaved person who is owned for ever and whose children and children's children are automatically enslaved. Chattel slaves are individuals treated as complete, property to be bought and sold. Chattel slavery was supported and made legal by European governments and monarchs. This type of enslavement was practised in European colonies from the sixteenth century onwards.


Europeans wanted lots of slaves, so people were captured to be made slaves.

Enslaved Africans were transported huge distances to work. They had no chance of returning home.

Children whose parents were enslaved became slaves as well.

How were they enslaved?



Although some of the enslaved were forced to travel long distances to reach the coast, the costs of moving slaves, including the risk of deaths, meant that the homeland of the majority of enslaved Africans, who were taken away by the British, lay within a few hundred kilometres of the Atlantic coast.


Slave forts were established all along the coast of West Africa, to house captured Africans in holding pens (barracoons) awaiting transport. They were equipped with up to a hundred guns and cannons to defend European interests on the coast, by keeping competitors at bay. There were approximately 80 castles dotted along the slave-trading coast. The forts had the same basic design, with narrow windowless stone dungeons for captured Africans and fine European residences.


The largest of these forts was Elmina, in modern day Ghana. The fort had been fought over by the Portuguese, the Dutch and finally the British.  At the height of the trade, Elmina housed 400 company personnel, including the company director, as well as 300 'castle slaves'. The whole commerce surrounding the Slave Trade had created a town outside the castle, of about 1000 Africans.


In other cases, the enslaved Africans were kept on board the ships, until sufficient numbers were captured, waiting perhaps for months in cramped conditions, before setting sail.


The ethnic groups of the enslaved Africans


The British traders covered the West African coast from Senegal in the north to the Congo in the south, occasionally venturing to take slaves from South-East Africa in present day Mozambique.


Some areas or venues on African Atlantic coast were more attractive to traders looking for the supply of enslaved people than others. This attractiveness was dependant on the level of support from the local chieftains rather than geographical barriers or the demography of local populations. Where there was cooperation it was easier to maintain order and efficiency in the process of the trade.




3 0
3 years ago
Which word best describes President Kennedy's initial approach to civil rights issues?
aksik [14]
President Kennedy was Cautious
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Before the war, Kim Il-Sung informed the Soviet Union and China of his plan to invade
ki77a [65]
Kim II-Sung invaded South Korea. He informed both the Soviet Union and China since they were his allies.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What impact did the introduction of smallpox have on the growth of African slavery
    11·1 answer
  • 1) How did Roman historians try to renew patriotism?
    5·1 answer
  • What factors shaped each of the main reasons of africa during the early 1800's?
    11·1 answer
  • Who was considered the first missionary?<br><br> Cicero<br> Abraham<br> Paul<br> Jesus
    14·1 answer
  • Why were the Cherokee forced to move in spite of the Supreme Court ruling in Worcester vs Georgia
    13·1 answer
  • What is Washington saying in this quote?
    8·1 answer
  • What happened to the economy of Germany between 1922-1933?
    10·1 answer
  • Write a paragraph stating your opinion about which is the most important right preserved by the Bill of Rights .
    5·1 answer
  • What does President Nixon imply about the United States in this speech? It has committed to fighting for peace around the world.
    15·1 answer
  • How does the video seek to make the atom bomb seem less threatening?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!