Answer:
The correct answer is <u><em>B) Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory evidence</em></u>
Explanation:
History is not always easy to study and the further we go back, the further we have to rely on second hand or third hand sources.
For example, in order to study something that happened 20 years ago is fairly easy since it would be recorded either in newspapers, books, or even video.
However, it is not always easy to draw conclusions when we are studying an event that took place 2,000 years ago.
Most of them times we rely on information passed on from generations before until finally someone wrote it down.
While many historians get tempted to Over-simply an event to draw certain conclusions, this should not be practiced as it creates a bias and forces us to study or even research for contradictory evidence. Sometimes, this contradictory evidence can completely change our understanding of the event.
The answer for this question is B. seeing as it had nothing to do with black slaves to Liberia and the ocean passage was completely different and the Irish weren't involved at all
Hope this helps :)
The city located there is Melbourne, Victoria.
Buddhism was spread to China along the Silk Road.
The system of the old regime is when France had the feudal system, the 1st Estate, the 2nd Estate, and the 3rd Estate. During the old regime, there was no social mobility amongst the Estates. The King also had absolute power while the three estates had no political power. The 1st Estate were the clergy who were rich and owned a lot of land. The 2nd Estate were the nobles, who also had a lot of land and were rich. The 3rd Estate were the peasants and the commoners, who were poor and had very little land.
