Answer:
Inductive reasoning
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is one kind of analysis in which the truth of the premises give support to the conclusion but they do not really count on the power to guarantee them.
Inductive reasoning can also be considered as a soft skill since it is related to the way you interact with people and behave in social situations.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c89c2/c89c2efa6256825da9acd50652afb2da00273e8f" alt="\LARGE{ \underline{ \tt{Required \: answer:}}}"
Indirect speech:
The judge asked the lawyer if/whether he would be able to complete his arguments the next day.
Explanation:
The dialogue inside the inverted comma is a interrogative sentence or a question being asked by the Judge to the lawyer, the reporting verb 'asked' will be used.
And as the reporting verb is in past tense, the main verb will also be converted to past tense. The time mentioned 'tomorrow' will change into 'next day'
⛱️ data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a7d8/8a7d8dbcab265e33577a26859d83659d8832fecc" alt="\large{ \blue{ \bf{FadedElla}}}"
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Persuasive speeches are usually aimed to convince the audience to accept the speaker's point of view. <em>(whether right or wrong)</em>. Judging by that, the speech in question has already passed as a persuasive speech since it is aimed at persuading an audience.
Similarly, the content of the persuasive speech has a lot to do with the adoption of a <em>new tax policy </em>by the government<em>. </em>Hence, this makes this makes the speech a persuasive speech on a question of policy.
Logan has five dollars so I think it's red