1. poka is supposed to be polka
2. walts=waltz
3. karatie=karate
4.kyosk=kiosk
5. macaronie=macaroni
6. tomatoe=tomato
7. bananana=banana
8. Bring a permission form from your parents.
9. stampede
10. buffet
:)
A comma after an unfamiliar word
Answer:
This is an example of a failure of deductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Deductive reasoning is one that first analyzes two premises to reach a conclusion. If the text shown in the question above were an example of deductive reasoning done correctly, we should read: "we do not know B, nor C and therefore we cannot say that they are equal to A."
However, we see the narrator of the text presenting conclusions without evaluating the premises, presenting a false conclusion. This is an example of inductive reasoning failure.
The last sentence uses abbreviations appropriately.