Answer:
In his 1959 book Man, the State, and War he explains the causes of war by distinguishing three levels (or “images”): the individual, the state, and the international system. On each level can be found causes that lead to international conflict.
Answer:
A) It made the case stronger by showing that Palestinians were willing to live peacefully alongside Israelis.
Explanation:
The Israeli-Palestinian clash is one of the world's longest-running and most controversial conflicts. At its heart, it is a contention between two self-determination movements— the Jewish Zionist task and the Palestinian national project— that make a case for a similar region. In any case, it is thus, a great deal more confounded than that, with apparently every reality and chronicled detail little and extensive contested by the opposite sides and their defenders.
The British were, by and large, a dominating force. The American Colonies occupied land that the British would’ve claimed as their own. Infuriated, the British would vehemently disagree with the claim of American Colonials being treated unfairly. Throughout history, the British have experienced many successes and failures. Many times, they discover land only to lose it to another country. For example, the laborious endeavors the British had gone through to conquer India had come to waste when India decided to declare independence. Similarly, the American colonials split from the British. So no, I do not think the British thought the mistreatment towards the colonials was in any way unfair.
Ez
The competition for colonies was actually driven by a economic policy
Add a spelling error to make it seem legit
The reason why Lincoln did this is because he wanted the Union to reform and heal as quickly as possible. He accurately predicted that animosity on both sides would lead to harsh divisions over the next several decades.
