1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aalyn [17]
3 years ago
9

List and explain the component of the cabinet and explain their powers???? Helpppp

History
1 answer:
irina1246 [14]3 years ago
3 0

President-veto legislation, command the armed forces, adjourn Congress, and grant pardons

Vice president-cast a tie-breaking vote when the senate is in deadlock and verify the official vote count of the U.S. Electoral College

Heads of executive branches-communicates presidents messages to promote trade interests

Attorney general-enforces federal laws, and provides legal counsel in federal cases

You might be interested in
How did the Aztecs grow their civilizations physically and economically
timofeeve [1]
The Aztecs have many attributes, for instance they are poets, many pieces have been written by the Aztecs. They are also sculptors and artists as we can see their works of art in museums. Aztecs are scholars who teach many people within their GRAND empire.One famous attribute is their military strength, they are known to be the strongest army in all the eastern hemisphere. The Aztecs are certainly one of the most interesting empires in the world in my opinion.<span />
8 0
3 years ago
Why do people support the Right to Bear Arms amendment?
EleoNora [17]

Answer:

Explanation:Modern debates about the Second Amendment have focused on whether it protects a private right of individuals to keep and bear arms, or a right that can be exercised only through militia organizations like the National Guard. This question, however, was not even raised until long after the Bill of Rights was adopted.

Many in the Founding generation believed that governments are prone to use soldiers to oppress the people. English history suggested that this risk could be controlled by permitting the government to raise armies (consisting of full-time paid troops) only when needed to fight foreign adversaries. For other purposes, such as responding to sudden invasions or other emergencies, the government could rely on a militia that consisted of ordinary civilians who supplied their own weapons and received some part-time, unpaid military training.

The onset of war does not always allow time to raise and train an army, and the Revolutionary War showed that militia forces could not be relied on for national defense. The Constitutional Convention therefore decided that the federal government should have almost unfettered authority to establish peacetime standing armies and to regulate the militia.

This massive shift of power from the states to the federal government generated one of the chief objections to the proposed Constitution. Anti-Federalists argued that the proposed Constitution would take from the states their principal means of defense against federal usurpation. The Federalists responded that fears of federal oppression were overblown, in part because the American people were armed and would be almost impossible to subdue through military force.

Implicit in the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists were two shared assumptions. First, that the proposed new Constitution gave the federal government almost total legal authority over the army and militia. Second, that the federal government should not have any authority at all to disarm the citizenry. They disagreed only about whether an armed populace could adequately deter federal oppression.

The Second Amendment conceded nothing to the Anti-Federalists’ desire to sharply curtail the military power of the federal government, which would have required substantial changes in the original Constitution. Yet the Amendment was easily accepted because of widespread agreement that the federal government should not have the power to infringe the right of the people to keep and bear arms, any more than it should have the power to abridge the freedom of speech or prohibit the free exercise of religion.

Much has changed since 1791. The traditional militia fell into desuetude, and state-based militia organizations were eventually incorporated into the federal military structure. The nation’s military establishment has become enormously more powerful than eighteenth century armies. We still hear political rhetoric about federal tyranny, but most Americans do not fear the nation’s armed forces and virtually no one thinks that an armed populace could defeat those forces in battle. Furthermore, eighteenth century civilians routinely kept at home the very same weapons they would need if called to serve in the militia, while modern soldiers are equipped with weapons that differ significantly from those generally thought appropriate for civilian uses. Civilians no longer expect to use their household weapons for militia duty, although they still keep and bear arms to defend against common criminals (as well as for hunting and other forms of recreation).

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This is nothing related to school.... sort of, but anyways i got in trouble for apparently "Making out" in the locker rooms thei
ra1l [238]
They do have cameras in the locker rooms

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The New England Schoolteacher
Valentin [98]

St. Paul:

- Hardly even a town in

- Buildings were mostly log huts

- Streets were bumpy and muddy

Citizens:

- Only a few hundred people lived there

- Mostly men

- Not many school-aged children lived in the

- About half of the parents could read

School House:

- Abandoned blacksmith's shop

- Mud plaster held the log walls together

- Small, dirty windows let in hardly any sunlight

- Rats and snakes lurked in the corners

You can choose which two details you would like to use.

Hope this helped :)

Have a great day!

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the purpose of the poll tax?
Delicious77 [7]

Answer:

In the United States, voting poll taxes (whose payment was a precondition to voting in an election) have been used to disenfranchise impoverished and minority voters (especially under Reconstruction).

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • English writer of the Romantic period that found inspiration in England’s Lake District. The young poet traveled from England to
    10·1 answer
  • The first goal of data analysis is to communicate research results true or false
    12·2 answers
  • What was the date of Paul revere famous ride
    8·1 answer
  • Which answer choice describes how Korea was divided at the beginning of the Korean War?
    15·1 answer
  • How did wealthy Italian families encourage learning
    12·1 answer
  • One of my primary objectives is to form the tools so that the tools themselves shall fashion the work and give to every part its
    15·1 answer
  • which of the following does this definition describe? the increase an overall temperature change resulting in more severe weathe
    9·1 answer
  • Help me answer the questions please ♡︎.​
    9·1 answer
  • The legislative branch has the power to borrow money.
    10·2 answers
  • Panuto paghambingin ang kakapusan at kakulangan sa pamamagitan ng pagsagot sa venn diagram
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!