It is true that a case study allows a more detailed look at the life of a single subject than any other study.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
Case Study is a detailed study of a particular subject which can be anything like an individual person or a group or a situation that has occurred at a particular period of time.
This study is a study of almost all the aspects of the subject and an in depth study of the subject of study and also the conditions of the subject is also studied. Normally to study a case study, a method of research is used to collect information of the subject that is to be studied.
Answer:
1. b. the judicial branch to decide whether laws or actions of the other two branches are constitutional.
2. True.
3. Marbury v. Madison.
Explanation:
1. The doctrine of judicial review allows the judicial branch to decide whether laws or actions of the other two branches are constitutional. The other two (2) branches are the Legislative and Executive arm of government.
Also, any law or actions that aren't consistent with the constitution or that are unconstitutional are declared null and void.
2. When a state exercises jurisdiction over property within that state, this type of jurisdiction is called in rem. Rem is a Latin word which typically means against a thing. In this context, a thing can be anything such as a property.
3. The power of judicial review has remained unchallenged since it was established by which United States Supreme Court decision, Marbury v. Madison. The case was one which on the 24th of February, 1803, the Supreme Court of the United States of America ruled that an act of the US Congress was unconditional and as such declaring it null and void. This gave rise to the judicial review in the United States of America.
I'd say Major Mayan Urban Areas because they were cities.
Answer:hard times no food no nothing there was poor money so everyone went bankrupt
Explanation:
Answer:
not a violation of antitrust law
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario this refusal is most likely not a violation of antitrust law. That is because these laws are designed to promote competition. Therefore since they are one of many producers, refusal to sell is not a violation. The Port Harbor Restaurant Corporation can obtain another provider.