When judges interpret a constitutional provision, the argument goes, they are bound by this original understanding, which can only be changed through the for- mal process of constitutional amendment under Article V. By contrast, others have argued in favor of treating the Constitution as a living document.
Try looking online in Google
Life became better around
I believe they would be exercising <span>symbolic speech
</span><span>symbolic speech refers to the type of statement that being conveyed through a certain actions rather than using words.
Even though this type of speech does not directly mentioned in the constitution, it's still considered to be protected under the first amendment.</span>
Pacuvius is an ancient Roman painter