An ontological argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of God that uses ontology. Many arguments fall under the category of the ontological, and they tend to involve arguments about the state of being or existing. More specifically, ontological arguments tend to start with an a priori theory about the organization of the universe. If that organizational structure is true, the argument will provide reasons why God must exist.
Lets take a look in each statement:
<u>monitoring campaigns to ensure everything is legal</u> - False - It is The Federal Election Commission (FEC) administers federal campaign finance laws;
<u>monitoring polling stations to ensure ballots are long form</u> - True - One of the responsibilities of the election official is to provide ballots (device used to cast votes);
<u>approving ballots for voters to use</u> - False - The State has the authority to regulate the approval of the ballots;
<u>monitoring polls to ensure everything is legal</u> - True - They are responsible for the proper and orderly voting at polling stations;
<u>reporting back to party officials with any issue or discrepancy they may have found at the polls</u> - False - It does not correspond to the duties of the election official.
Which gives us B and D correct.
Where is the image? I can’t help you without it!!
