Answer:
inaccuracies of other scholars.
Explanation:
In the informative Essay by James Cross Giblin, of name: In The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone, the author shows many achievements of the scholars who were studying the hieroglyphs and trying to understand them.
He says that <em>"A few genuine advances in understanding the hieroglyphs were made during the 1700s."</em>, but he doesn't stop there, since the he doesn't refrain from criticizing other scholars as you can see here:
<em>"For example, a Greek writer named Horapollo said correctly that the picture of a goose stood for the word "son." But then he explained that this was because geese took special care of their young, which was completely inaccurate."</em>
A wide flat field is "finer” than rugged terrain for it can be tilled easily to produce wheat and so represents good white bread. A small thatched cottage, which a modern viewer might consider pretty, will be considered unattractive by an Elizabethan traveler, for cottagers are generally poor
I see the theme by him making up his own life by doing what he do is right not wrong
Answer:
I wanna say the last one but not sure at all
