Answer:
B. lacking parallelism
Explanation:
The original sentence contains a predicate nominative (<em>singer</em>) and an action verb (<em>plays</em>), which shows lack of parallelism.
The best way to fix the error would be to use a parallel structure, which is the repetition of a certain grammatical form within a sentence:
"Shelia E. <em>sings </em>and<em> plays</em> the drums."
Now the sentence uses two action verbs <em>sings </em>and<em> plays</em> in the present tense, and this is an example of parallelism.
The workers (were ) on a strike for three week when the agreement on pay (was reached).
<span>Which is true about supporting details?<span> <span>Irrelevant details are unrelated to the point the author is making.Essential details are those that do not directly support an author’s main point.A good reader does not distinguish between relevant</span></span></span>
Well if there's no road... It is never allowed. sorry
They painted 1/4 of the fence. If there are 4 total and you paint 1. That will be 1 out of 4 painted. So 1/4
