Answer:
D. the ability to overturn prior rulings
Explanation:
they decided that the law was wrong and changed it
Answer:
A person in a communal relationship with another is more likely to be concerned with the <em>non contingent </em>effect of helping. While a person in an exchange relationship with another is more likely to be concerned with the <em>contingent</em> effect of helping others.
Explanation:
<em>Communal relationships</em> are closely knitted relationships, such that occurs within family and partners. In a communal relationship, helping does not come with future expected benefits (non contingent) . Giving is done with an objective of ensuring the other person's need is met.
In an <em>Exchange relationship</em>, the effect of helping comes with future benefits of repayments. Giving is done with an objective of some future repayment. This type of relationship occurs among business partners. 'If person A does person B a favor today, it is expected that person B will repay the favor to person A in future.
Answer:
Sharon, the producer intentionally submitted a false statement in support of a claim. This is considered a form of libel.
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>Defamation and libel are examples of false state statements. These are unverifiable statements made with personal opinions. A retraction may help by limiting the penalty in case defamation or fraud were to be the final sentence. Retracting means essentially taking back what was said.</em>
Answer:
directing
Explanation:
its when a individual has power to affect other people by motivating others to carry work at a high level with producing great results of high quality at an effective and efficient manner