Answer:
D. People with firm convictions are willing to take risks.
Explanation:
Answer:
People would react with fear to a program like the Great Society because these programs might raise taxes.
Explanation:
The Great Society was a large-scale social policy reform program run by the federal government under President Lyndon B. Johnson, who served from 1963 to 1969. The program was proclaimed in early 1964, a few months after Johnson took over the presidency after the murder of his predecessor John F. Kennedy, and continued until the end of his term in the White House in January 1969. The main objectives of the reform program were to fight poverty, strengthen the rights of African Americans and other minorities, and to implement comprehensive reforms in the areas of education and health. Environmental and consumer protection and the expansion of the infrastructure were further considerations.
The truth is that all these programs implied a considerable increase in public spending, with huge budget items that would be destined to cover these social expenses. Therefore, a large part of American society (especially Republicans and conservatives in general) feared that these programs could significantly raise taxes. For this reason, many of the representatives of these groups opposed the implementation of the Great Society.
During the 1920s, which were also known as the roaring 20s, the stock market went up alot in that time frame. The stock market went up a lot until October 29th when the market crashed.
Answer:
C. It establishes legal precedents that are almost always followed by
lower courts.
Explanation:
Judges frequently take assistance from previous decisions and rely on past interpretations of legal issues. These instances or cases that can be used as an example of law are regarded as precedents for future proceedings. The United States is using the common law system in its state and lower courts The concept of common law is the obligation that courts, within the same jurisdiction, pursue the judgment of higher-level courts. Perhaps a consistent body of law has appeared from this legacy of stare decisions.
