1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
777dan777 [17]
3 years ago
15

What was the Dred Scott vs Sandford case

History
2 answers:
joja [24]3 years ago
5 0
<span>during this ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that slaves were not citizens of the United States so they could not expect any protection from the Federal Government or the courts.</span>
allochka39001 [22]3 years ago
4 0
SUMMARY: In Dred Scott v. Sandford (argued 1856 -- decided 1857), the Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court. The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories.

In March of 1857, the United States Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, declared that all blacks -- slaves as well as free -- were not and could never become citizens of the United States. The court also declared the 1820 Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, thus permiting slavery in all of the country's territories.

<span>The case before the court was that of </span>Dred Scott v. Sanford<span>. Dred Scott, a slave who had lived in the free state of Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving back to the slave state of Missouri, had appealed to the Supreme Court in hopes of being granted his freedom. </span>

<span>Taney -- a staunch supporter of slavery and intent on protecting southerners from northern aggression -- wrote in the Court's majority opinion that, because Scott was black, he was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue. The framers of the Constitution, he wrote, believed that blacks "had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. He was bought and sold and treated as an ordinary article of merchandise and traffic, whenever profit could be made by it." </span>

Referring to the language in the Declaration of Independence that includes the phrase, "all men are created equal," Taney reasoned that "it is too clear for dispute, that the enslaved African race were not intended to be included, and formed no part of the people who framed and adopted this declaration. . . ."

<span>Abolitionists were incensed. Although disappointed, Frederick Douglass, found a bright side to the decision and announced, "my hopes were never brighter than now." For Douglass, the decision would bring slavery to the attention of the nation and was a step toward slavery's ultimate destruction. </span>
You might be interested in
World War1 definition
Lesechka [4]

a war between the allies (Russia, France, British Empire, Italy, United States, Japan, Rumania, Serbia, Belgium, Greece, Portugal, Montenegro) and the Central Powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary, Turkey, Bulgaria) from 1914 to 1918.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was one direct result of the War of 1812?
VashaNatasha [74]

H. Americans had to find new ways to meet their needs for cloth.

4 0
3 years ago
How many terrorist attacks happened last 20 years in america?
aleksandr82 [10.1K]
<span>There have been a total of 85 attacks classified as terrorism on American soil in the last 20 years, including both domestic and international terrorist incidents.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Joshua Vermier of Sacramento, California, received a raise after his first year on the job to $45,200 from his initial salary of
Lera25 [3.4K]

Answer:

2.73%

Explanation:

First at all, we need to calculate the raise of the salary due only to inflation:

42.500 x ( 1 + 2.8%) = 43.998,4 USD.

The real increase is the difference between the previous calculation and the 45.200 dollars. Then, we need to know which percentage is necessary to increase the salary up to 42.500.

43.998,4 * ( 1 + x%) = 45.200

43.998,4 + 43.998,4 * x% = 45.200

43.998,4 * x% = 1201.6

x% = 1201.6 / 43.998,4

<h2>x% = 2.73</h2>

5 0
3 years ago
Who was the Spanish Priest Who fought for native American rights?
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Bartolomé de Las Casas

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Based on this map, approximately how far did the songhai empire stretch eastward into the interior from the coast?
    5·1 answer
  • Wilson urged congress to delacre war on germany because it
    6·1 answer
  • What states did the transcontinental railroad go through?
    9·1 answer
  • If the smartphone supply increases, you can expect the price of smartphones to
    9·2 answers
  • Why did the British decide to tax the colonist
    6·2 answers
  • A series of 4 graphics with a center box, labeled Volunteers, surrounded by 4 other labeled boxes. Graphic A: Volunteering time,
    14·2 answers
  • Talk to me!! I’m bored :(
    11·2 answers
  • How did the Cold War shape the politics, economy, society and culture of the United States.
    10·1 answer
  • Which three of the following statements best describe the Quakers.pick all that aplay
    12·1 answer
  • How old was isaac when abraham was going to sacrifice him
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!