1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
777dan777 [17]
3 years ago
15

What was the Dred Scott vs Sandford case

History
2 answers:
joja [24]3 years ago
5 0
<span>during this ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that slaves were not citizens of the United States so they could not expect any protection from the Federal Government or the courts.</span>
allochka39001 [22]3 years ago
4 0
SUMMARY: In Dred Scott v. Sandford (argued 1856 -- decided 1857), the Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court. The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories.

In March of 1857, the United States Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, declared that all blacks -- slaves as well as free -- were not and could never become citizens of the United States. The court also declared the 1820 Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, thus permiting slavery in all of the country's territories.

<span>The case before the court was that of </span>Dred Scott v. Sanford<span>. Dred Scott, a slave who had lived in the free state of Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving back to the slave state of Missouri, had appealed to the Supreme Court in hopes of being granted his freedom. </span>

<span>Taney -- a staunch supporter of slavery and intent on protecting southerners from northern aggression -- wrote in the Court's majority opinion that, because Scott was black, he was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue. The framers of the Constitution, he wrote, believed that blacks "had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. He was bought and sold and treated as an ordinary article of merchandise and traffic, whenever profit could be made by it." </span>

Referring to the language in the Declaration of Independence that includes the phrase, "all men are created equal," Taney reasoned that "it is too clear for dispute, that the enslaved African race were not intended to be included, and formed no part of the people who framed and adopted this declaration. . . ."

<span>Abolitionists were incensed. Although disappointed, Frederick Douglass, found a bright side to the decision and announced, "my hopes were never brighter than now." For Douglass, the decision would bring slavery to the attention of the nation and was a step toward slavery's ultimate destruction. </span>
You might be interested in
Which political leader is described above?
Lerok [7]
James Wilson

Hope this helps :))
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who were the ottoman Turks
Lera25 [3.4K]
<span>The Ottoman Empire, also known as the Turkish Empire, Ottoman Turkey, was an empire founded at the end of the thirteenth century in northwestern Anatolia in the vicinity of Bilecik and Söğüt by the Oghuz Turkish tribal leader Osman.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who has the authority to decide if the president’s actions exceed the powers of the executive branch?
Sindrei [870]
Head of the judicial branch 
3 0
2 years ago
Many European countries competed with each other to add new territory to their empires in the late nineteenth and early twentiet
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]

Answer:

1. The degredation of local economies and colonial deindustrialization

2. An unheaval of traditional life and religion

3. The fostering of nationalism in colonial societies

Explanation:

Examples:

1. The destruction of the Bengal fabric industry by the East India Company

2. The presence of EIC missionaries in the Indo-Gangetic Plain. Men like Padre Jennings directly influenced the Sepoy Mutiny by creating tensions in the local Hindu and Muslim populations of Delhi and Meerut.

3. The rise of the Indian National Congress, the Brahmo-Samaj in India, and the Vietminh in Vietnam.

7 0
3 years ago
How did conservative leaders react to nationalist movements in Europe in the nineteenth century?
DerKrebs [107]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

They were frightened by nationalist leaders and wanted to reduce their influence.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was Germany’s strategic problem during WW1
    9·1 answer
  • What were alexander the great's greatest achievements?
    10·1 answer
  • BRAINLIEST TO CORRECT ANSWER
    15·2 answers
  • What was the goal of the populism party
    6·2 answers
  • Which accurately describes the development of civilization in ancient Mesopotamia?
    13·1 answer
  • HELP ASAPPP :(
    14·2 answers
  • How is a representative democracy different from a direct democracy?
    14·2 answers
  • The Great Migration was prompted in part by*
    14·1 answer
  • Why was the Folsom discovery so important?<br><br>please i am trying to answer a question​
    12·1 answer
  • I HAVE A TEST DUE TONIGHT, CAN SOMEBODY HELP ME WITH THIS QUESTION!
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!