<u>A</u><u>n</u><u>s</u><u>w</u><u>e</u><u>r</u><u>:</u><u> </u>Both things will help slow the rate of climate change by lowering air pollution, rejuvenating the soil, giving animals shelter, and less energy waste.
Sorry if it isn't long enough but you can stretch out what I said!
Along with the fact that the infrastructural and industrial levels of the African colonies was never really developed by Europeans, the many various and opposing ethnic groups had no one to keep them in check now. As a result many civil wars took place between different religions, specific religious denominations, and specific ethnic groups of said religious denominations. Also nearly all of the leaders that broke free of European rule were woefully unprepared to lead a country both governmentally and economically. All of these factors are what lead to Africa's current problems.
Answer:
Mt Elbrus
Explanation:
Just search in the notes.
A family that extends beyond the immediate family, including grandparents, aunts, uncles, and other relatives
Answer:
downwind of a nuclear power plant
Explanation:
Living in close proximity to a nuclear power plant or coal-burning plant is not something that would be preferable by most people, especially when it comes to living on the downwind side of them, but if I had to choose it will be living downwind of a nuclear power plant. The nuclear power plant is not a polluter of the air, so living downwind of it will not be a problem for the human health. The coal-burning plant, on the other hand, is one of the heaviest polluters of the air, as it releases enormous amounts of carbon dioxide. This will have very negative effects to the human health, so it is a situation to be avoided if possible. The nuclear plant does comes with a risk, as most things, but the chances are very small that a catastrophe will occur, and even if it does, it doesn't really matter on which side of it the people are living if they are in the same area as the plant.
