The simple subject is obviously kittens.....
Stream-of-consciousness is a very stylistic form of free indirect discourse. It is not spontaneous, or unintentional, or anything of the sort. In fact, if anything, it's just the opposite. It's highly stylized, but also purposeful and calculating. It sees the world wholly through the character's mind instead of through their senses, save for how the mind and the senses interact.
It relates to a lot of things - free association, synesthesia, free indirect discourse, without actually being any of them.
<span>There's only a handful of writers that can actually do stream-of-consciousness writing with any success - Joyce and Faulkner come to mind immediately. In short, there's nothing wrong with trying it, but there's also nothing wrong with not having done that, but having done, say, free association instead.</span>
I think the answer should be option D. ! hope this helps
I believe cochlear implants since deaf people often read lips and watch hands which is both sign language and visual communication
i think deaf people would prefer getting together in person as well since it is easier to read lips and/or see signs
whilst cochlear implants not everyone will have them and they wont be bothered by it so thats why i'm saying Cochlear implants
sorry if im wrong...