Annette drove through an intersection without looking and hit Vincent's car that he had driven into the intersection without obe
ying a stop sign. Annette sued Vincent. The jury found that Annette’s fault contributed 30 percent to the collision and determined that her total loss was $100,000. Under comparative negligence, the jury should award Annette: a. $20,000.
b. $80,000.
c. $100,000.
d. nothing.
When an accident occurs, the blame or fault is determined by the contributions of each party towards the accident.
In a pure comparative negligence theory, the victim or plaintiff who files a case, sue the other party and received some part of the damages and hence each party receives the amount related to their damages minus the part of their fault.
In our case, Annette fault contributes 30% to the collision and determined that her total loss was $100,000.
A secured loan is money that you borrow by offering an asset as collateral. The lender will hold on the asset until the full loan amount is paid back. A secured loan is a good option when borrowing a large amount of money. It attracts low-interest rates.
Lenders consider secured loans less risky because the customer provides a valuable asset as a back-up should they fail to repay. Homes and land are the most common properties used as collateral for secured loans.
products bought from this place are not a good deal as I am paying more than the market exchange rate.
2. at equilibrium exchange rate:
100 x 0.25% = $25
the price is $25
3. from answers 1 and 2, I will not want demand Stan's rupees. the products are costly to get.
4. Stan's currency is obviously overvalued. the people from this country now has increased purchasing power so they can purchase goods in dollars, therefore they would be supplying their currency.
5. They will have to buy up the surplus of rupees so that they can easily keep up with maintaining the rupee at half a dollar.
1. Ticket location is the most important attributes in the overall purchase decision. It is with a 39.49% of the general choice weight.
2. Verily, the conjoint assessment results are important in choosing assessing decisions. Ticket cost contained 38% of the examination. From the data, we can conclude fans are increasingly loath to purchase $60 tickets. By joining this ticket cost with various characteristics with higher utility scores, we can deliver a group that will be impressively all the more addressing the fans. The proportionate should be conceivable with the other evaluating decisions to make various group offers .The Portland Trail Blazers' NBA foundation was in a terrible position. Fans were spilling out the door, and the players couldn't find the bushel. The gathering wore a 22-36 record and advance managers presently ran its home, the Rose Garden after its owners had proclaimed money related indebtedness. The gathering's guide had been ended for sure. The field had been a sellout just three years earlier, and the gathering had been dear by Portland. However, starting in the 2003 season, interest began to fall pointedly by more than 15 percent by 2005. In the midst of a comparative time, 42 of 70 indulgence suites sat void in the midst of the period. More Portland crowd individuals viewed the atmosphere by then Blazers' amusements.
3. Yes there could be more than one.
By looking at the conjoint assessment and other data open from the survey, I believe that the Portland Trail Blazers the officials should offer two unmistakable packs. One being either six or ten redirections for each group. Disregarding the way that organization lean towards the six preoccupation pack, giving fans the decisions to buy for ten diversions will empower the gathering to sell more tickets. Regarding seating, they should offer the mid 300 court seats, averaging between $40-50
