First of all, if the story would be in chronological order, there would be no story at all. This is because the main character of the story, Anna, won't tell the narrator, her daughter, a lot about her past. "She has kept no squinted costume, no photographs, no fliers or posters from that part of her youth".
Because the narrator tells the story in the present and uses flashbacks is the reason that she can unify certain themes, such as the three times her mother saved her life because of her leaps. "I owe her my existence three times". These three leaps the narrator owes her life might be: when Anna Saves herself when she falls from the trapeze, when she falls in love with the narrator's father, and when she saves the narrator life from a fire by climbing to the room where the narrator is trapped.
<span>Al Gore presented the evidence of climate change using the following: Greenland and Antarctic ice caps. </span>
Mark Brainliest please
The discourse on language in education has taken the intelligentsia by storm in the wake of the Single National Curriculum (SNC). The polarisation between various points of view is so intense that a meaningful debate is impossible. It is intriguing why the supporters of English distort some issues beyond recognition. Hence here is another attempt to clarify issues.
First, it must be restated that the discussion is not whether children should learn English or a local language. Those who support the local languages as the medium of instruction have always added ‘and English must be taught as a foreign language’. I have yet to figure out why we are accused of pushing out English from our education system to make our children backwards and incapable of handling technology. It seems to imply that even if we are failing to teach English correctly it is fine so long as we stick to our mantra of English and English alone.
Hi, you've asked an incomplete/unclear question. The full question read;
Which of the phrases below is <u>not</u> in the future perfect continuous?
a) You will have been waiting here for three hours by 8 o'clock.
b) You will be waiting for her when her plane arrives tonight.
c) By the end of next month I will have been living here for ten years.
d) When I finish this course, I will have been learning Italian for ten years.
e) Next month I will have been working here for two years.
Answer:
<u>b) You will be waiting for her when her plane arrives tonight.</u>
Explanation:
We make this conclusion because the phrase <em>"will have been" </em> (which is the future perfect of the verb "to be") is often added to the subject of a sentence to make it future perfect continuous.
However, after careful check of all the sentences, we notice all of them except option b used the future perfect continuous phrase, <em>"will have been." </em>
