The correct answer that would best complete the given statement above would be third option. <span>The most influential factor in ending the traditional Indian way of life was </span>their constant intertribal warfare. Hope this is the answer that you are looking for.
Answer:
He was the President, Andrew Johnson, of the United States.
Explanation:
Andrew Johnson was the first US President to be impeached. He held the President office from 1865 to 1869.
Plan of Reconstruction:
This plan was prepared by the President Lincoln and after his assassination, Andrew Johnson wanted to execute this plan. This plan was made to add the Southern state into union in late nineteenth century on the condition if the 10 percent voter would swore an oath of allegiance to the union.
Why he was impeached:
The President Andrew Johnson was impeached due to the plan of reconstruction and impeachment trail was started when he violated the <em>Tenure of Office Pact </em>that restrict the President from dismissing appointed officials without taking permission from Congress. He dismissed the Secretary of War from the cabinet.
The differences in the wild and hatcheries make it so the different salmon adapt differently and have different traits.
If salmon are split up into different habitats, one being in the wild and one being in captivity, they will eventually have different adaptations from each other and their offspring will develop traits that are better suited for their environment.
Wild salmon and salmon that are raised in captivity are going to be very different from each other. The salmon in captivity do not have to actively hunt for their food, be wary of certain predators, or may not want to reproduce.
Taking these factors into account, it is very possible that the salmon raised in captivity will have reduced reproductive success compared to the salmon that thrive in the wild. Along with this, they would most likely have many genetic differences from each other and other traits that better adapt to their living situations.
Answer:
Historians consider political cartoons to be credible resources in historical inquiry because they give a true picture of the political environment in that particular time period. ... Such cartoons are drawn by knowledgeable people who understand the public mindset very well.
Explanation:
