Answer:
Although the sentence is not underlined on your question, I'm assuming the underlined portion is sentence [6] because it seems out-of-place.
Sentence 6 strays away from the main point of the paragraph, that:
"Henry David Thoreau... crafted an entire essay on the values of civil disobedience, and those opinions can be seen throughout the 20th century."
Sentence 6 describes a personal story about museum shirts, which really does not any essential information to the paragraph.
So, my guess would be A, since it detracts from the clear line of reasoning established in the paragraph.
Answer:
Kailangan isa puso at isa isip na kailangan ang masinop na paggmiat ng pinagkukunan upang maiwasan ang kakulangan na magsasanhi ng disekwilibriyo. Nasa mamamayan ang kapangyarihan upang mapanatili ang maayos na ekwilibriyong presyo at dami sa pamilihan.
Explanation:
The statement that describes the shift from D1 to D2 is option c: Demand for the product decreased.
<h3>Which causes a change in demand?</h3>
A change in demand is one that is caused by:
- The tastes and preferences of customers
- The the composition or size of the population
- The prices of related goods
- Expectations.
Note that a change in any one of the factors above can determine the quantity people who are known to be willing to buy at a said price and this will cause a shift in demand.
Hence, The statement that describes the shift from D1 to D2 is option c: Demand for the product decreased.
Learn more about Demand from
brainly.com/question/28224672
#SPJ1
The Patriarchal social organization developed in both of these
Answer: It limited colonies' trade interactions with the Dutch and other foreign powers.
Explanation:
This is a part of the Navigation Acts that was passed by the English Parliament in an attempt to control trade in the American colonies and limit competition between the British and other foreign powers particularly the Dutch.
The Dutch and other countries had become great trading allies of the American colonies and the British felt their goods were not being patronised enough. This Act cut off the American colonies from other countries so that they they would trade with the British alone and patronise them.
