Answer:
1) He discovered the sensations of light, dark, hunger, thirst, and cold.
2) He discovered that he was a monster
Explanation:
1) He discovered the sensations of light, dark, hunger, thirst, and cold. According to his story, one day he finds a fire and is pleased at the warmth it creates, but he becomes dismayed when he burns himself on the hot embers. He also realizes that he can keep the fire alive by adding wood, and that the fire is good not only for heat and warmth but also for making food more palatable.
2) He discovered that he was a monster
His presence causes an old man inside to shriek and run away in fear. The monster proceeds to a village, where more people flee at the sight of him. As a result of these incidents, he resolves to stay away from humans.
Answer: Mixed my friend is your answer
Explanation:
Answer:
dummy do it yo self ight ok
Explanation:
plzzzzzzzz
Here's the criteria for Persuasive:
May make claims based on opinion. May not take opposing ideas into account.
Persuades by appealing to the audience’s emotion or by relying on the character or credentials of the writer – less on the merits of his or her reasons and evidence. Emotion-based.
I believe he's using mostly persuasive reasoning.
Here's the criteria for Argumentative reasoning:
Makes claims based on factual evidence. Makes counter-claims. The author takes opposing views into account. Neutralizes or "defeats" serious opposing ideas. Convinces audience through the merit and reasonableness of the claims and proofs offered. (I only see use of the first and last one, not 2nd or 3rd one). Here's a link for your reference. You can do a google search on persuasive vs argumentative.
Often compares texts or ideas to establish a position.
Logic based.
An example of a morally significant act that I have done in the past which I consider exercise of freedom was when I once helped return home a 90-year-old man who was lost in the city, which took me more than 3 hours and it made me miss my job that day.
In my exercise of this freedom, I also considered society's role in limiting my behavior since if I had not helped this person, I could have had legal consequences for failing to help her if something had happened just at the moment that I was passing by him, in addition of the feeling of moral duty that would have remained in me if I had not helped him.
Learn more in brainly.com/question/21093552
