Option C -Operating Cash Flow = Current Liabilities / Operating Cash Flow s not a correct way of calculating a liquidity ratio.
Liquidity ratios are a measure of a company's ability to settle its short-term payments. A company has the ability to quickly exchange its revenues and is using them to pay his obligations is dictated by its liquidity ratios. The potential to pay back debts and keep engaged on installments is simpler the better the ratio. Since this can vary by industry, and current ratio of 1.0 usually signals that a group's debt do not exceeding its liquid assets. In enterprises in which there is a quicker product changeover and/or shorter payment cycles, ratings below 1.0 may be acceptable.
Absolute liquidity ratio =(Cash + Marketable Securities)÷ Current Liability.
Learn more about Liquidity ratios here:
brainly.com/question/15395374
#SPJ4
Answer:. ............$
1. Bad debt Dr. 11.0000
Account receivable Or. 11.000
Narration: Bad debts writing off debtors
2. Cash/Bank. Dr 1800
Profit or loss Cr. 1800
Narration. Bad debt previously written off recovered
3. Profit or loss Dr 4000
Allowance for doubtful debts Cr
4000
Narration. Increase in provision for doubtful debts.
Answer:
$1,479
Explanation:
For computing the total deposit, first we have to determine the bank charges which is shown below:
= Merchandise sold × bank charges rate
= $1,500 × 1.4%
= 21
Now the total amount deposited would be
= Merchandise sold - bank charges
= $1,500 - $21
= $1,479
Simply we deduct the bank charges from the Merchandise sold so that the correct amount can come.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": for negligence because the harm was foreseeable.
Explanation:
In Law, foreseeability is a concept related to what the proximate causes could be after an event. The concept is helpful to determine the limit of liability according to the primary event that happened and the type and manner of harm. The harm caused by rescuers like firefighters and negligence of health care providers like doctors and nurses is considered foreseeable.
<em>In Emmy's case, the repeated thefts to the store where she works while having a nonfunctioning alarm (negligence) make the store owner liable for the injuries caused by a perpetrator who broke Emmy's leg during a robbery since that event was foreseeable.</em>